I picked one of these up yesterday. After looking at and reading reviews, and the price ($219.00 plus tax) I thought I would give it a try.
(not my rifle, stock picture from the dealer).
Initial observations:
- Well packaged with lots of thick oil, in a plastic bag, in a box with fitted Styrofoam; manual included (very small exploded parts drawings though).
- Usual Norinco machining marks on the internals, and sharp edges in a lot of places (I'll see how it wears in before I do any polishing).
- The black bluing is very dark, even and smooth, and IMO better than both Savage and Marlin.
- After cleaning and oiling, I applied some Lithium grease to the bolt and the bolt slides, and worked the action maybe 50 times; and it smoothed out nice. There are some wear marks so I know what to
polish now.
- Sights: Front sight was loose; tightened the screw, it's hood is secure; the front blade is square and no contrast, added a bit of high vis paint to the tip. Rear sight had a lose adjustment ramp; I torqued
the spring a bit to provide more pressure on the ramp and it's good now. Edges are sharp, but the sights are visually finer than either the Marlin or the Savage.
- Composite Stock: First off; it felt and fit me way better than either the Savage Mark II and the Marlin XT; I would give it a 9.5 out of 10 for appearance and a 10/10 for fit (including free-floated barrel).
The sling rings are crooked, ugly and asymmetrical (I will be replacing them with screw in studs). The 24" barrel gives a long sight radius which is always a benefit for precise aiming.
- Rifling is strong and defined, and has a mirror finish. Pretty standard crown on the barrel (not threaded with a knurled protective nut as seen in most videos and pictures; I think standard crowning looks
better, and I have no use for the thread anyway).
A number of reviews and some of Norinco's own material bill this rifle as a CZ clone; which it is but it is no CZ; however, at about 1/3 the cost, and the good reviews by others, I figured it certainly is worth a try!
I have yet to shoot it, but will report back here once I have.
Many thanks to Bullseye in London for their great service, knowledge, and patience while letting me compare, and make up my mind!
Mark

(not my rifle, stock picture from the dealer).
Initial observations:
- Well packaged with lots of thick oil, in a plastic bag, in a box with fitted Styrofoam; manual included (very small exploded parts drawings though).
- Usual Norinco machining marks on the internals, and sharp edges in a lot of places (I'll see how it wears in before I do any polishing).
- The black bluing is very dark, even and smooth, and IMO better than both Savage and Marlin.
- After cleaning and oiling, I applied some Lithium grease to the bolt and the bolt slides, and worked the action maybe 50 times; and it smoothed out nice. There are some wear marks so I know what to
polish now.
- Sights: Front sight was loose; tightened the screw, it's hood is secure; the front blade is square and no contrast, added a bit of high vis paint to the tip. Rear sight had a lose adjustment ramp; I torqued
the spring a bit to provide more pressure on the ramp and it's good now. Edges are sharp, but the sights are visually finer than either the Marlin or the Savage.
- Composite Stock: First off; it felt and fit me way better than either the Savage Mark II and the Marlin XT; I would give it a 9.5 out of 10 for appearance and a 10/10 for fit (including free-floated barrel).
The sling rings are crooked, ugly and asymmetrical (I will be replacing them with screw in studs). The 24" barrel gives a long sight radius which is always a benefit for precise aiming.
- Rifling is strong and defined, and has a mirror finish. Pretty standard crown on the barrel (not threaded with a knurled protective nut as seen in most videos and pictures; I think standard crowning looks
better, and I have no use for the thread anyway).
A number of reviews and some of Norinco's own material bill this rifle as a CZ clone; which it is but it is no CZ; however, at about 1/3 the cost, and the good reviews by others, I figured it certainly is worth a try!
I have yet to shoot it, but will report back here once I have.
Many thanks to Bullseye in London for their great service, knowledge, and patience while letting me compare, and make up my mind!
Mark