Norinco NP22 vs NZ85B?

L

Lowestform

Regular
Rating - 100%
33   0   0
Location
North of Edmonton
I've owned both a CZ Shadow SP-01 and an older Sig p226, but had to sell them in my divorce. Funds don't allow for a real CZ or Sig, and I've read decent things about both of these norinco clones. I would like to get back into basic range fun with a 9mm.

Now, which do you feel is a better path to start on? A friend has a Norc Sig clone in 40S&W, and he had LPA adjustable sights on it, and a Sig short reset trigger on it. It shoot well, I feel. Is the CZ85 clone similarly modify-able?

I'm leaning towards the NP22 or 34, but would like to hear some opinions first.
 
NP22 is mechanically simple, and can be upgraded with SIG parts. All it needs is a deep clean, maybe some minor deburring, and SIG E2 kit if you want a smaller grip.

NZ85 not so sure. Parts may or may not work across various CZ clones.

That said, a low mileage SIG P320 off the EE might be another decent option.
 
I've had one of the first runs of the nz85b for 6 or so years now. On my particular pistol the internals are the same as genuine CZ, EXCEPT! Some of the pins are a different diameter. Some parts can be made to fit but it's not so simple as swapping in a CZ hammer. The springs however swap over no problem. I simply swapped to CZ springs and gave the internals a light polish on a fine stone and it now has a trigger superior to my CZ shadowline. Front sight is the same cut as CZ. Rear sight cut is narrower but can be opened up by a gunsmith to CZ for sight upgrades. Functions with CZ, Mecgar and Tanfoglio mags no problem. It's been a great pistol for me.
 
I have a NP 34 that shoots great, but I also "splurged" on a VG condition surplus CZ 85 pre-B model which I love. Keep in mind the CZ pre-B magazines can be few and far between. I think you would enjoy either of them. The simple answer is buy both, but I'm greedy by nature. ;)
 
Lowestform said:
I've owned both a CZ Shadow SP-01 and an older Sig p226, but had to sell them in my divorce. Funds don't allow for a real CZ or Sig, and I've read decent things about both of these norinco clones. I would like to get back into basic range fun with a 9mm.

Now, which do you feel is a better path to start on? A friend has a Norc Sig clone in 40S&W, and he had LPA adjustable sights on it, and a Sig short reset trigger on it. It shoot well, I feel. Is the CZ85 clone similarly modify-able?

I'm leaning towards the NP22 or 34, but would like to hear some opinions first.
Click to expand...

I have the NP58 in 40 S&W like your friend. While it shoots very well, I had to do a lot of work on the feed ramps (frame and barrel) to get it to feed every type of ammo. I have heard that the 9mm NP22 series pistols don't have the same issues with feeding. It is very accurate, with a nice single action trigger pull, but a long reset. Double action is not great. BTW, it has a very large grip if you have small hands.

I also have an NZ85B; what everyone else is telling you is true. Function is flawless, trigger pull is amazing for the price point; but I changed the grips. The Norinco grips, I found slippery. You will need to file the grips a bit as CZ ones don't quite fit. This gun fits me very well.

I also have one of their 1911s in .45, it too is a great gun with a good trigger; and I have one in 9mm on the way. My 45 shoots great too.

My NP 58 has a very nice high grade finish on the frame; the slide is brushed blue. It has the nicest finish I have ever seen on a Norinco. The other two are nice too, just not quite at the same level. My NZ is blue frame, satin chrome slide; my 1911 is all satin chrome. I will never sell any of them.
 
Cool; I got an old set of the hard plastic CZ75 Military grips for $10.00; and not as nice as the rubber CZ ones; way better than the Norinco ones. I got a set of Uncle Mikes overmolded rubber grips for the NP58, and they are great! My hand no longer hurts after 100 rounds. LOL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom