Just curious, but why is that people are #####ing about the price of these, but they're willing to drop double that on a Tavor?
-Tavor is non-restricted.
-Tavor comes with rails.
-Tavor comes with a milspec-quality red dot (please, let's not start debating about what type of sight we'd like to see on it, I'm just trying to establish the fact that there is a "value-add")
-Tavor can be switched to left hand (not sure if this is true of the Norinco)
I'm not in the line to drop $3K on a Tavor. I've got some other purchasing to do first...including a $400 Norinco M14, and maybe a Chinese 870 copy in either 14" or 12.5"

. I would probably lean towards buying an SL8

instead of the Tavor given that I already own a very short AR.
I have no problem with the lack of a big name brand on a firearm or fit and finish being a little less than Swiss, as long as the basic quality is there.
Essentially, for $1500 you're getting a restricted non-moa rifle that does not have the availability of aftermarket parts that an AR does. You can purchase a Stag/RRA/Armalite brand new off the shelf at your local dealer for the exact same price...and get your choice of barrel lengths, stock options, sight options. Then you can spend a few dollars more and configure it with pistol grips, stocks, additional rails...you get the picture.
I'm not saying that the Norinco is not a good rifle, or that effort involved to bring it over was a waste. I'm simply saying that at this price point, and being restricted, the only advantage it offers over an AR is in being different.
