grayrc said:Just received a full refund from Marstar for a Norinco YL 12-1 M-37 "Tactical" that wouldn't chamber 2 3/4" shells due to a number of manufacturing issues. The fit and finish was horrible, but could have been tolerated if the gun actually worked. May have been the in 1 in a million lemon... but I suspect not ;-)
/gc
tiriaq said:Some Norincos seem to be more of a parts kit than a ready to go firearm. I sold only one of the sporting clones through my little shop to see what it was like. Didn't bring in another. Some Norincos are acceptable as is, others need tweaking. Overall, QC and attention to detail seem sporadic.
grayrc said:I don't know, but honestly, I can't imagine why you'd want to take the parts off a Norinco and put them on an actual Ithica. If you've seen one of the Norinco's then you know what I'm talking about. I had to re-glue the recoil pad on my folding stock and the site on my barrel was welded on at 15 degrees off the radial axis, there was significant scoring in the barrel (on arrival), the gun wouldn't feed because the chamber end of the barrel was so rough, etc...
IMHO, if you have a genuine Ithica you want to turn into a tactical shotgun, there must be a cheaper way to go than parting out a Norinco clone, and you'd end-up with better end results.
/gc
I don't think cycling snap caps would expose any cycling issues. Mine used to jam the most with heavy payload 3" magnum waterfowl loads, and others have found more problems with 2.75" loads. Basically, you need the weight of the payload to expose any cycling issues.cantom said:The only way I'd buy one of these shotguns after reading all the posts on here including yours is if I could go to Marstar and hand pick one myself with cycling snap caps through it part of the process...wonder if they'd go for that?? They do sound like something of a POS...
cantom said:What's with Norinco anyway? Chinese labour is cheap...they of anyone could spend days polishing up this junk. Why ship guns that are so burred up and sloppily built that they don't work?
grayrc said:You're absolutely right. Clearly the guy beating the drum and the other guy with the whip need to be sent on some management quality training
/gc
grayrc said:You're absolutely right. Clearly the guy beating the drum and his buddy with the whip need to be sent on some management quality training
re the snap caps - as per PoweredByBeer - my results varied (2 3/4" plastic wouldn't cycle, but I was able to get it to feed heavier 3" caps... even though the gun shaved strips off of them!). Myself and a 2 friends bought these - so I've played with three from the fall 2005 'shipment'. We literally couldn't get one to cycle 2 3/4" shot loads ... at all. One of them was moderately better than the other two, but still couldn't have been called 'reliable', even with 3" slugs which seemed to work 'better' but still failed to feed at an unacceptable rate.
I absolutely agree that when you buy a Norinco you accept the trade-off for a discounted price and commit to doing some work to tune it (more or less depending on which Norinco model), and I think if there's some reasonable expectation that you'll end up with a reliable gun with decent fit & finish then it's worth spending the time. I like working on guns too... but I'd rather make a good gun 'better' than spend time trying to get a POS working...
If you're buying something for actual defense (home, camp, etc...), it seems to me that you want very low failure rate - I just wasn't convinced that any amount of polishing/grinding (or other gunsmithing that was within the scope of my time & abilities) would get me to that point. If Marstar wasn't so committed to customer satisfaction, I might be out in the workshop polishing it right now... but I sent it in thinking I might as well get them to have a look at it while it's still under warranty, and they decided to refund the money - I took that as an sign of how much work might have been required to get it working right.
I've come to the conclusion that based on the relatively minimal price difference for a 'reliable' shotgun (an 870 express synthetic for example) it isn't worth the risk of having something unreliable. If I was buying it for plinking that would be different, but I wanted a backpacking gun and got sucked in by the folding stock. I can still shoot a bear/bad guy/zombie without a folding stock, heat shield, ghost ring sights, etc..., but the Norinco was just a $200 club.
What's unfortunate is that although this may be an a-typically bad bad example of Norinco's quality (maybe the Ithica action just doesn't lend itself to Chinese manufacturing), it's left me very reluctant to try other Norinco's (even though I've heard good things about their 870 clone, the 1911, the M305, etc...). If I were Marstar... I'd consider dropping this one from the line-up.
/gc
buckbrush said:Having hada few 1200 win, and one 2200, and still having a n.i.b. unfired 1200 winchester, I can honestly say I wouln't want another one, even for free. If you gave me one, I would sell it, buy a dog, and shoot the dog!
colt45gunner said:Not sure what this shotgun looks like, but for only $ 550.00 (taxes in) Cdn.
minus the red dot optic, saddle mount & the heat shield.you can have this set up like on mine.
$360 plus taxes for the gun & approx. $ 105.00 for pistol grip stock, w/ pad
it's a Winchester defender - 18" barrel, 7 in the tube + 1= 8 rounds total,
w/ a 6 position AR type stock.
I've NEVER had a feeding problem & it's a quality make !
http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d136/colt45gunner/MyToys2.jpg
How low of a price is this Norinco, that you'd buy it over a winchester ?
poweredbybeer said:My Norc cost me about $250 (with shipping & taxes) by the time it arrived at my door. It looks like this;
![]()
IMHO, for what I wanted it for, it's a great deal and I'm happy with it. I enjoy taking it apart and fiddling with it. I may be a rare customer, the kind who will buy junk and be happy with it, but so be it. To each his own, as they sayNice toys BTW colt45gunner, looks damn cool!
Thanx, they are fun to shoot too![]()
![]()
cool shotgun too buddy. still recomend a retractable stock over a folding one, so you can adjust length of pull. also depends on what you're using it for, i guess.
Kano said:Any one know if some of these came in with the M305s?



























