Ohio Ordnance Works M240-SLR

[BlkMamba]

Would it be possible to import the Ohio Ordnance Works M240-SLR ?

 

[rally guy]

5 round belts

 

[Wanhope]

5 round belts

 

[BlkMamba]

5 round belts

 

[Korporal]

$15,000

Unless it has a new receiver and not just the side plate, it could be considered a converted-auto.

Nonetheless, I want one.

 

[tootall]

So that we know what we are discussing...
ht tp://www.ohioordnanceworks.com/Firearms/OOWExclusiveFirearms/M240_SLR.rif

 

[MegaMonkeyChunk]

With all the belt feds coming in, we need something a little more modern like the M240.

If only that company making semi Minimis was still in business.

 

[BlkMamba]

$15,000

Unless it has a new receiver and not just the side plate, it could be considered a converted-auto.

Nonetheless, I want one.

Fires from a closed bolt, the right side plate, bolt and trigger groups have been redesigned. Major operating parts have been dimensionally changed to prevent interchanging with full-auto parts. In short it is manufactured as a semi-auto from the start.

 

[TRich]

there is no point with 5 rnd belts... especially at $15,000... That is more than my car cost me by about $2,000.

 

[BlkMamba]

there is no point with 5 rnd belts... especially at $15,000... That is more than my car cost me by about $2,000.

As much of a point as the 5 round mags.

 

[TRich]

i guess but then what is the point of paying $15,000 for that when you get an SKS for $200? shoots same amount of rounds per mag

 

[Mil Specs]

Danmit Jim... Someone needs to come up with a 10 RD pistol belt for that thing. Lol

 

[BlkMamba]

i guess but then what is the point of paying $15,000 for that when you get an SKS for $200? shoots same amount of rounds per mag

Absolutely, buy yourself the SKS.

 

[Korporal]

Fires from a closed bolt, the right side plate, bolt and trigger groups have been redesigned. Major operating parts have been dimensionally changed to prevent interchanging with full-auto parts. In short it is manufactured as a semi-auto from the start.

Unfortunately you have to think like the RCMP here.
They will take the right side plate off and swap out the semi parts with full-auto ones. If it goes all happy-trigger it's a no-go, goes click or semi only, good-to-go. This is pretty much what they do now to all ex-military arm submissions.

If the whole receiver is newly made from scratch and full auto parts won't fit there is no reason it shouldn't be approved.

 

[tiriaq]

Unfortunately you have to think like the RCMP here.
They will take the right side plate off and swap out the semi parts with full-auto ones. If it goes all happy-trigger it's a no-go, goes click or semi only, good-to-go. This is pretty much what they do now to all ex-military arm submissions.

If the whole receiver is newly made from scratch and full auto parts won't fit there is no reason it shouldn't be approved.

No, a remanufacture to this degree would not be the case.
Do you have any example of this being the procedure now being applied to all ex-military arms submissions?
This was certainly not the case with the T97, BD38/BD3008.
If you look at the firearms which have been rejected on the basis of convertibility, the conversion procedure is uniformly superficial, requiring minor changes.

 

[BlkMamba]

So, North Sylva would it be possible to import the Ohio Ordnance Works M240-SLR ?

 

[elvis3006]

Any new info on this ?

 

[Semi12]

I would also be interested

 

[winnipegger]

so 5 rd belts, but it uses disintegrating link? that's more ridiculous than the aluminum rivet in a mag! How could anyone ever enforce such a thing?

 

[Rusty Joots]

Danmit Jim... Someone needs to come up with a 10 RD pistol belt for that thing. Lol

Hahaha! Nice one