- Location
- The Conservative part of Ontario
Interesting Senior, I had a 1908 that did indeed have a hole at the end of the barrel and a screw extending through the magazine cap, that went into it. It had been modified similar to the subject rifle, with a hacksawed short mag. I restored the rifle, with a bunch of parts I had around the house, and sold it some years ago.Actually on original SR carbines the barrel band is between the front site & the muzzle.
And for JYCAgain on a SRC carbine there is no hole for the mag cap screw to go in to.
![]()
![]()
Hopefully I can shoot a rifle better than I can a camera![]()
Picked it up at an auction for a hundred bucks, and sold it for 250.
It had a front sight similar to the one in your pic I understand some of them had a "German silver" insert, mine was steel. My front band was also behind the sight. It had a band that was very heavy, not just a thin strap of metal, but filled in with a metal V on both sides. Made putting it on interesting.
The shortened mag on mine, a terrible job, had a habit of flying out past the barrel band and dumping the shells on the ground.
As I said earlier, there were a lot of customized Winchesters, add to that, that Winchester made a lot of little variations over the years.
There are problems with determining barrels on the 1892 Winchester for example, because they were apparently just pulled from a container, not in sequence, so some Black powder barrels were found on new rifles well into the smokeless era.
******
Thought I'd best come back and edit this, as my memory is foggy
The front band was acquired, as was the mag, so could be not original design. The only thing I can say for sure is that the hole was there to accept the magazine screw, and the mark in the bluing indicated that the band was supposed to be behind the sight. It's also possible, that the hole in mine was drilled at some time in the past, and not original at all.
********
From this discussion we can say that there might have been a hole there on the subject gun. So the fact that there isn't one proves nothing at all.
Back to square one.
Thanks Senior!
Last edited:




















































