One Cal - Multiple Rifles

Down to .22, 6.5mm, 7mm and 30cal now, just different brass behind an appropriate bullet for the task. Also down to 6 different cartridges plus .22lr, 20ga and 12ga. Very comfortable with what I have of selections for varmints, plinking, range and hunting apps.
 
After a rather involved and spirited conversation with hunting friends this past weekend, we discussed the pros/cons of having one caliber in multiple setups.
The advantage with that it allows the shooter to have different types of rifles for different uses and hunting situations.

I have a blued and walnut 275 Rigby custom gun for nice days and another stainless T3 (in the works) in 7x57.

Also have two T3s in 223. One in varmint weight with big scope and another Hunter with lightweight scope.

Same chamberings, different applications. Less overhead for loading kit.
 
After a rather involved and spirited conversation with hunting friends this past weekend, we discussed the pros/cons of having one caliber in multiple setups.

I won’t divulge our thoughts quite yet, but wanted to throw it out to the CGN brethren to gather your insights, trials, tribulations or failures on such?
Do you lean caliber as in bullet diameter? If so then it makes sense to have different one: .308, .300WM, .308 Norma Mag, etc…

I have one caliber in two setups. A 7lb hunting rifle suitable for long hikes and mountain adventures, and a 15lb behemoth suitable only for hitting steel at 1500 meters. Both are in .300PRC and do their designated jobs very well. I see no benefits to having other rifles in that chambering for any other uses.

Sounds like you have an interesting group of friends suffering from cabin fever? 😉
 
Ok.. so basically the discussion was, if we take target/bench shooting & the ballistics part out of the equation which was the better route (?)

If a hunter only chose one single caliber based on what and where they hunted, is it better to have say only X cal in one, two or three setups (a backup or two if you will) and be able to have familiarity, confidence and know its’ limitations in that caliber if the change of setups was needed?

Or..

Is it better to have multiple calibers across the board to cover a variety of situations and still have the backup setup covered essentially?

There are/were several arguments for either/or scenarios above brought up.

- My one cal does everything I need and I have another in a backup just in case something goes sideways with my main setup.

- I hunt a broad range of field conditions, so multiple cals & setups cover off everything I could encounter depending on the what and where.

- Why would one overlap different cals ie; 270/30-06 or 7mm-08/6.5CM/308 etc when largely you’re just hair splitting between a lot of calibers? Pick one and be done with it..

- I’d choose X single cal because it’s widely/readily avail should I need to obtain more at some backwater country store and I don’t reload, factory ammo only.

Again, If we take out the “I just want or like more” aspect, I guess for the person who only hunts one or two species, doesn’t target shoot a whole lot or at all a 1 or 2 and done setup/s make some sense. The average non-CGN type hunter basically.

For the more serious person hunting multiple species across various terrains, who maybe has vested into reloading, there’s a case for multiple calibers and setups absolutely.

At the end of it all, we came to the conclusion that neither route was right or wrong and no clear winner. Both sides had their pros or cons and really came down to individual specifics.

And for the record.. I have, do currently and probably will overlap calibers myself. Like most here I’m always trying new or different setups. Sometimes in either multiple and/or same calibers setups. Do I cover off short, average and longer ranges in different setups? Yes… Have I found my holy grail/never to be sold yet? only one.. the rest are expendable, trade material or to be sold off for the next to catch my eye.

Cheers
After reading this I'm thinking I misunderstood you. Do you mean cartridge when you say caliber?
 
I covered both options in my post "caliber" and "cartridge."

I think there is a wrong answer here for any given individual. I hunt everything from coyotes to buffalo, and in places from thick Boreal where you can't see 20 yards to open mountain tops where visibiity is measured in miles, not yards.

For me, one caliber OR one cartridge is definitely wrong, no matter how many platforms it might be in.

If you only hunt whitetails in open hardwoods, sure one rifle will do it... but a dozen rifles is NEVER wrong.

Realistically a 30-06 or 300mag would work just fine for like 99% of us and 99% of the hunting we do. Is it ideal for coyotes? Of course not. But it'll kill em dead.

Once you start talking things like buffalo the -06 starts to feel a bit weak, but even then wasn't woodleigh making a 240gr bullet specifically for buffalo?


But that would be so ####ing boring...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DGY
Ok if we are talking back ups, i would say pick the same rifle in the same chambering set up the same way, same scope same sling same same same and sight both rifles with the same ammo reloads or factory and practice with both so both are 100% interchangeable. That would be the real back up deal!! But that is pretty unusual I think for some one to have a twin pair of rifle just in case something craps out… in my 29 years of hunting up here in all kind of conditions I never had a rifle or optic for that Mather that crapes out on me might happen but never did so far.
But most likely people will have a couple rifles in the cabinet that will pretty much do the same thing and can be use as a back up, for example, I have 30-06’s, 8x57, 9.3x62 that I know will work really good on anything. I hunt for up here. All different calibers all different chambering and all different ammo. But still on a moose up to 300m they will all do great! On bison I wouldn’t push the 30-06 and the 8x57 much passed 150-200m. Even on caribou, mountain or barren ground those 3 different cartridges would do just fine up to 300m my usual max anyway.
Of course if you have one 22lr, one 223, one 308 and one 500 nitro well for let’s say moose I don’t think you have much for a back up…. I guess the 500 will work !
 
One calibre could make reloading cheaper! :ROFLMAO:
And life simpler…. 30-06 24” barrel loaded with 125gr for varmint, 150gr for dear, 180gr for moose and 200gr for bison… four different scopes sighted in for the four different ammo, all mounted in QD rings!!
 
I gravitated early in my collecting to the 44 magnum. I have levers, a bolt, a semi, and a pump action in the caliber. The cartridge can do a lot within 100yards and is relatively inexpensive to reload. :)
 
I gravitated early in my collecting to the 44 magnum. I have levers, a bolt, a semi, and a pump action in the caliber. The cartridge can do a lot within 100yards and is relatively inexpensive to reload. :)
And similarly I landed on the 45 Colt side of that fence, and it's easy to buy another firearm in a calibre I already have, along with experience and reloading dies and everything, and I've resisted 44 because that's another set of everything. Similarly a shooter lands in a particular 30cal or a particular 6.5 chambering and it's easier to add another rifle in what you have.
 
Realistically a 30-06 or 300mag would work just fine for like 99% of us and 99% of the hunting we do. Is it ideal for coyotes? Of course not. But it'll kill em dead.

Once you start talking things like buffalo the -06 starts to feel a bit weak, but even then wasn't woodleigh making a 240gr bullet specifically for buffalo?


But that would be so ####ing boring...
I'm talking Cape Buffalo... can't use a .30-06 or .300 Mag...

Then there is elephant... not using it there either.
 
And life simpler…. 30-06 24” barrel loaded with 125gr for varmint, 150gr for dear, 180gr for moose and 200gr for bison… four different scopes sighted in for the four different ammo, all mounted in QD rings!!

If you really want things simple then just make one 180gr load and shoot everything with it. That's what my buddies who aren't gunnutz do.

Too boring for me, but it works...

I'm talking Cape Buffalo... can't use a .30-06 or .300 Mag...

Then there is elephant... not using it there either.

But Karamajo Bell only needed a 7x57! Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: DGY
Confusing to say the least.
Have we decided on Caliber or Cartridge.
Caliber would be many rifles in 30 caliber.
Cartridge on the other hand would be many rifles in your favorite 30 caliber cartridge.
But that depends on where you are hunting, and as stated above, boring but practicable.
I once had a conversation with John Hunt RIP, he said he used the 300 Weatherby for everything because it worked.

I am at the point in my life that I could be happy with one cartridge and a few specific rifles set up the way I want.
Yep that's me old and boring and practicable, but still having fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DGY
If you really want things simple then just make one 180gr load and shoot everything with it. That's what my buddies who aren't gunnutz do.

Too boring for me, but it works...



But Karamajo Bell only needed a 7x57! Lol
That is exactly what I use to do between my gun loonie fazes, one rifle one bullet carry everywhere shoot everything… now facking 12 rifles, some with a bunch of different bullets and loads for the same rifle… when I could own only one… but don’t wanna own only one!
 
Personally, for any given outing, I try to maximize the platform AND the cartridge... I wouldn't want to handicap myself either way.
 
22lr, 12G and .30 cal appropriate for the intended game, it's all ya need sonny! You can find ammo for those just about anywhere that sells ammo.
After those are covered bring whatever fun/experimental/showoff rig on top of those 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DGY
I have 22, 24, 25 26, 27, 28, 30 and 36 calibers. Three duplicate rifles/cartridges, all others are individual. I was going to add a 29 caliber to my list, just to peek some curiosity.:oops:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom