Ontario Moose hunt just died....

My zone is normally 505 Woodchopper .
It is amazing just how many moose are in in those two zones compared to some .
I have a lake lot in 510 and the danged things are everywhere! LOL
Cat
 
Last edited:
I'll never understand why someone would want to hunt a calf moose especially when populations are already decimated by unregulated hunters.

Compensatory mortality.

Calf moose are the most likely to not make it through the winter. Removing some from the population doesn't have a negative impact on overall population numbers because they would die from winter or predators anyways. One of the issues with understanding this concept is separating population level ideas from individuals. This is a well understood concept among wildlife managers though.

That said, it seems pretty evident that Ontario has allowed too many calf tags. A certain number of calfs won't negatively impact the population but clearly there are too many being taken given the other factors at play.
 
It’s pretty far fetched comparing wildlife and habitats between the west and Ontario I’ve spent enough time in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and northeastern BC to know how different these provinces are compared to a good chunk of Ontario, not saying exceptions aren’t made.
 
Compensatory mortality.

Calf moose are the most likely to not make it through the winter. Removing some from the population doesn't have a negative impact on overall population numbers because they would die from winter or predators anyways. One of the issues with understanding this concept is separating population level ideas from individuals. This is a well understood concept among wildlife managers though.

That said, it seems pretty evident that Ontario has allowed too many calf tags. A certain number of calfs won't negatively impact the population but clearly there are too many being taken given the other factors at play.

Too many folks watched Bambi as a youth I think... they sound off on a personal opinion without actually having knowledge of the situation... IMO. If F & G is issuing Cow ( or Calf ) tags... someone likely put a fair amount of homework into the matter. Seems awfully Fudd-ish to spout off without actually having knowledge of it.
Which I do not have myself... hence I leave it to someone who went to school for it and does it for a living.
Just my thoughts of course... carry on as you see fit
 
Too many folks watched Bambi as a youth I think... they sound off on a personal opinion without actually having knowledge of the situation... IMO. If F & G is issuing Cow ( or Calf ) tags... someone likely put a fair amount of homework into the matter. Seems awfully Fudd-ish to spout off without actually having knowledge of it.
Which I do not have myself... hence I leave it to someone who went to school for it and does it for a living.
Just my thoughts of course... carry on as you see fit

I don't know how much science was involved when they gave out 75,000 calf tags every year since 1970's.
 
Compensatory mortality.

Calf moose are the most likely to not make it through the winter. Removing some from the population doesn't have a negative impact on overall population numbers because they would die from winter or predators anyways. One of the issues with understanding this concept is separating population level ideas from individuals. This is a well understood concept among wildlife managers though.

That said, it seems pretty evident that Ontario has allowed too many calf tags. A certain number of calfs won't negatively impact the population but clearly there are too many being taken given the other factors at play.

I never bought into that concept. And never will.
 
Last edited:
I never bought into that concept. And never will.

Regardless, it is a legitimate management strategy, to allow for higher hunter participation with minimal impact on the moose population. The key is, and this is where Ontario went wrong for so many years, is controlling the calf tag allocation by management unit. For 20+ years, Ontario had an "over the counter" unlimited tag approach to managing calf harvest... that is an eventual recipe for disaster. Making calf tags available only in an exclusive draw and controlling the numbers by unit allows the MNR to control the harvest numbers.
 
I never bought into that concept. And never will.

And some people refuse to believe the earth is round, but their ignorance doesn't make it untrue.

There is a certain number of animals that WILL NOT survive the winter, and removing some of those animals from the landscape before winter does not negatively impact the herd size and in some cases can actually help because it allows the scarce resources that are available to go to animals that have a better chance of surviving winter.

Regardless, it is a legitimate management strategy, to allow for higher hunter participation with minimal impact on the moose population. The key is, and this is where Ontario went wrong for so many years, is controlling the calf tag allocation by management unit. For 20+ years, Ontario had an "over the counter" unlimited tag approach to managing calf harvest... that is an eventual recipe for disaster. Making calf tags available only in an exclusive draw and controlling the numbers by unit allows the MNR to control the harvest numbers.

Exactly. Its a management strategy. Ontario wasn't using it as a management strategy though, they were using it as a low bar for entry into moose hunting. I just hope their new tag system helps recover the population some.
 
Regardless, it is a legitimate management strategy, to allow for higher hunter participation with minimal impact on the moose population. The key is, and this is where Ontario went wrong for so many years, is controlling the calf tag allocation by management unit. For 20+ years, Ontario had an "over the counter" unlimited tag approach to managing calf harvest... that is an eventual recipe for disaster. Making calf tags available only in an exclusive draw and controlling the numbers by unit allows the MNR to control the harvest numbers.

Hoyt; you have stop answering these questions with factual answers... you post from the heart. And remember... this is a virtual woodstove in a Country store. Got to let the Old Timer's sound off without making them feel bad by showing them as being incorrect.
 
Just a quick comparator for interest. Maine has 75,000 moose. Ontario has 80,000. Maine has very low numbers (if any) of wolves compared to Ontario's 8,000 to 10,000. Maine has 23,000 black bears Ontario's estimate is 80,000. Maine has temperate winters compared to moose range Ontario. ( in case climate change is to be considered) Maine allows 3125 moose tags per season. 800 of these are antlerless ( cow or calf) the rest are for bulls only. Ontario allows 16,826 tags which includes cow calf tag numbers of around 10,000. With tag allotment(with party hunting in Ontario but not allowed in Maine) and the amount of predators it is obvious that we need to reduce the number of moose harvested by hunters if we want to increase the moose herd. The factors of indigenous harvest, bear/wolf predation are largely beyond our control so it boils down to taking a kick and dropping the moose tags even lower. Ontario hunters killed about 4,000 moose in 2018. Maine hunters killed 2,400 in 2018. I think that a 2 year hiatus on moose hunting (with close MNR&F bio observation) would reveal some interesting affect on moose numbers. I have no prediction they may go up, they may go down or stay the same. But at least we would have a baseline to start moose management with. Maine's successful ( to say the least) way of managing moose is largely the low issuance of tags and subsequent low harvest. I don't like this any more than any one else but we have to greatly reduce the number of moose we shoot each year to have the population grow. The season hiatus would support that action possibly. There may be many factors using up the moose that we are not aware of or feel that they are significant. Maine is quickly approaching an overpopulation of moose (due to land mass size) we on the other hand should be able to increase our herd to 190,000 animals with minimal environmental impact. Anyways just pondering hope the numbers are interesting.
sources OFAH moose management review, Ontario Ministry of natural Resources and Forestry moose hunting regs and Maine Department if Inland Fisheries and Wildlife.
Darryl

on that you do not count the moose from NB and QC going to maine. moose like other animals do not care about border ....
 
I would not support that... people just need to get out of their heads and realize that bear meat is excellent eating. In blind taste tests at our annual family wild game dinner, the bear dishes are invariably the favorites.

I would hate to see bear carcasses left in the bush to rot, although I know that is legal and acceptable in other jurisdictions.

I never understood the cow and calf harvest when I lived in ON. This point system may prove to be a good way for individuals to get a bull tag finally.



I've yet to have a single complaint....or leftovers when I bring a bear ham to dinner. Can't wait to tag another this spring.
Some hunters know their way around the kitchen, others don't.

that is an image not easy to fix and bear meat is excellent.
 
Good points but a even better to compare is Quebec

South of the St Laurence in Quebec. I’ve hunted in their provincial parks. Matane has 3 moose/square kilometre. It’s smaller than Algonquin park and they kill over 400 moose per season just in that park, the season in that park opens before the rest of Quebec and closes later. Boarders New Brunswick which has a 5 day season?.....

matane is the exeption in quebec world and moose hunting rifle is not last that long as well in other places in quebec ...
 
I'm going to eat a little bit of crow here... my son's best friend just got posted to the fish and game detachment in Maple Creek.
He was in Northern Saskatchewan. His friend said that a bear that's been in the bush eating proper bear food... Well it's a delicious thing. But if you get a bear that's been hanging out at the dump or the landfill... Not so good.
I've got a good start on how to plan my first bear hunt anyhow. I'm thinking 9.3 x 57. Mostly because it's such a nice stalking rifle.
 
Last edited:
Interesting concept. How does one access this information for perusal?

Every moose hunter that buys a moose license gets a calf tag, under the old system. 10 years ago they were giving 15000 or so adult tags in the draw, for 100k hunters. The other 75-85000 hunters got a calf tag. Not all were filled of course, but there was no science involved. It was a money grab to get hunters to buy licenses.

As stated, it should have been controlled per wmu. I realize some calves don't make winter, but without calves you dont get adults. No calf harvest would have been better than a free for all.
 
Every moose hunter that buys a moose license gets a calf tag, under the old system. 10 years ago they were giving 15000 or so adult tags in the draw, for 100k hunters. The other 75-85000 hunters got a calf tag. Not all were filled of course, but there was no science involved. It was a money grab to get hunters to buy licenses.

As stated, it should have been controlled per wmu. I realize some calves don't make winter, but without calves you dont get adults. No calf harvest would have been better than a free for all.

Agree'd. While I'm all for calf hunting under a well managed system, that clearly isn't what Ontario has been for the last few decades.
 
And some people refuse to believe the earth is round, but their ignorance doesn't make it untrue.

There is a certain number of animals that WILL NOT survive the winter, and removing some of those animals from the landscape before winter does not negatively impact the herd size and in some cases can actually help because it allows the scarce resources that are available to go to animals that have a better chance of surviving winter.



Exactly. Its a management strategy. Ontario wasn't using it as a management strategy though, they were using it as a low bar for entry into moose hunting. I just hope their new tag system helps recover the population some.

My point wasnt to start an argument, and yes if its managed properly it could work. However it wasnt. Lets say there were 1000 calves shot in a given year, of those 1000 do you really think that most of them would have been killed by predators or died offed from disease or accident? Those 1000 taken put more pressure on the remaining calves.
On a side note, as a bit of a sore spot, in WMU 48 and a couple others, we have had a calf draw for for about 20 years now. I have seen an increase in moose at least in the area I hunt yet the adult tags are continuously dropped.
But I do believe the earth is round lol.
 
This thread certainly didn't go the way the OP intended it. Hopefully he has at least learned from it and the error in his thinking.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom