Open Division vs Tactical Division Rant

Horse96

Regular
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Location
Calgary
This came up, indirectly, in another thread. With the mag fed pump and/or semi's gaining in popularity, thought I would post this for anyone trying to decide on what shiny new shotgun they want to get.

Shooting a mag fed shotgun puts you in open division in three gun. Most know that. Guns are equipment, and 3 gun is an equipment race; higher quality equipment, on average, makes you quicker. Take a bolt action rifle, revolver and pump sg to your next match and see how well you do compared to ar's, semi-auto pistol and semi-auto sg. So, for those that want a mag fed shotgun, because it's way cool, and it can be used in 3 gun, it's pretty much a no-brainer; if you are just doing it for fun, or just want a mag fed shotgun, because, well, who wouldn't!? I want one! But, I am fine shooting in tactical division.

I don't want to spend the cash on an open division pistol. And yes, I'd be tempted to go for a full 2011 race-gun. Because, well, in my mind if I went open, that means I want to the best of the best, irregardless of budget! And to be the best, I'd want to shoot with the best. I'd shoot IPSC open for 'practice.' But, I probably get more carried away with the details than most. For most, 3 gun is a fun thing to do, and I have to continually monitor myself to make sure that I am not getting too competitive and focus on still having fun.

That said, between open and tactical, there are different game plans (I did not say 'gaming' a stage intentionally) that a guy/girl will follow. The link below is a good example. Notice how the open guy is quicker, due to sg mag changes and it didn't make a difference on the short range in that stage, but on the rifle an rds at 1x and optic at full (4, 6, 8, whatever). To avoid reloading the sg, the tactical shooter opted to use the pistol (built-in stage rule), while the open guy just changed mags. Anyway, considering all of the extra cash spent on an open rig, the open shooter in the video bought himself only 3.39 seconds!

The open shooter Clint's time was 18.95, while tactical shooter Rob's time was 22.37. So, assuming a mag-fed shotgun is the same price as a top of the line mag-tube semi, we'll say that the pistol is where the extra dough is being spent. If a guy compared STI pistols, the DVC open is $5,800 while the DVC 3gun is $4,300. So, just on the cost of the gun alone (not practice and etc) the cost (assuming you get quick enough using it) is $443.48 per second gained! Incredible! I don't even know what his shotgun and massive compensator and etc cost.

While it is true that an rmr or whatnot on a glock or m&p and etc will work for most, still think about it. If an rmr is $700, for eg, then the price per second gained is $206.49. Incredible! And that doesn't include milling your slide if you have a non mos-model, or whatever. Also, that doesn't factor in porting or a compensator for the pistol either. If the rules allow a compensator, you are crazy not to take full advantage.

3 gun is an equipment race, and in shooting open, you are choosing to shoot in the (marginally, and an expensive margin at that) fastest division in 3gun. If you're goal is to just have fun, then let 'er buck. Shoot whatever you want! But if are wanting to be competitive, think twice about the mag-fed sg and all the other gear and etc you will need to be the best of the best. That is an expensive margin: $200 per second gained (assuming you can be quick enough to utilize the equipment benefits) on the low-end, and up to $443 on the high-end. And also, if you really want to rub your buddies nose in how slow he is compared to your sheer and ludicrous light speed, it only counts if your equipment is the same, or worse, than his!

 
Last edited:
Not 100% sure what your rant is about, but in one's chosen division, you compete against others with the same equipment limitation/setups.

As such, the stage plan will reflect the most efficient use of the equipment, and more importantly, reflect the strengths of the shooter.

In Canada, doesn't matter how much money you throw at open gear, the advantage really isn't there vs tac optics
rifle and pistol capacities are the same, and mag fed semi shotgun capacity in almost all cases is 5.

Can a mag fed shotgun be reloaded faster than someone quadloading?
Yes and no.
In theory it can be faster, but someone who knows how to play the game will find the correct spots in a stage to reload while moving and lose no time to a mag fed gun.

The only place I personally feel there may be an advantage is with the pistol.
The comp and dot in the right hands can be faster than iron sights.

If we are talking about the US, sure, mag fed shotguns have no capacity limitations, pistol mags don't have capacity limitation etc.
But if you look at the results in any of the majors, the spread between open and tac ops isn't that big, and in some cases, a tac ops guy will even win high overall.

It all boils down to the guy holding the equipment.
 
Hey Paul,

Maybe I wasn't clear enough, my fault. To be totally clear would have made for a really long post. I tried to shorten to keep the reading low.

Basically, I was talking about: why someone would buy a mag-fed sg, pump or semi; what it means to be in open division (because shooting mag-fed sg's put you in open), and how the advantage is rather small (which we both agree on) especially given that shooting open is more expensive (that's why I mentioned a $200 low per second gain on the low end to a $400 gain per second on the high end); that shooting open really matters when it comes down to the pistol (which we both agree on); and, I didn't speak to it directly, but via implication, does being the overall best in open mean that you are the best? I mean, if you are shooting open, I would think the onus is really on you to win because your competition is shooting with higher drag equipment?

If you win overall open, well, you should. If you don't, well, even though you have better equipment, someone else has more skill than you. Kind of a 'you better win' scenario.

At any rate, it's just a conversation/rant and reflection after digesting my matches from this year's shooting season.
 
Some folks shoot open as they age because of recoil reduction, eyesight going bad etc.

It's not always about the 'best of the best' equipment to purchase victory.

Some people actually care less that they win... but they want to compete and enjoy the sport in their advancing age.

It boils down to the enjoyment of the sport.

I have shot heavy, and open class, even without an open class pistol, and had a blast!!! My SG has mags so I was in open. Did not bother me a bit. Even finished below my norm :) Had a great time with fellow gunnies, and that made the event for me


Since I will never be good enough to be sponsored, I don't need to worry about one gun bumping me into a more challenging division. I shoot for pure enjoyment.

People who are the elite athletes, and push themselves, and tune to the nth degree are awe inspiring to watch, and I do get a real thrill watching them. They also seem to enjoy rivalries with fellow competitors as well.

In my opinion, if you shoot to enjoy shooting, or are a hard-bitten competitor, as long as you are on the range, and not biting the couch, that is all that matters
 
Ah, gotcha.
More than likely, I just glossed over your essay in the first post and missed the point. :)

Truth be told, the only reason I don't shoot in open is because we can't have the fun stuff here in Canada.
Give me a Vepr 12 and full capacity mags, I probably wouldn't touch my M2 again.
 
....

Since I will never be good enough to be sponsored, ......

Different topic, but sponsorship has more to do with return on investment than your skill.
Plenty of people get stuff from companies and can't hit the broad side of a barn.
They can however turn people's attention to that company's products and convert sales.
 
You don't gave to spend money to shoot "open".

Depending on the match, just neglect to plug your shotgun tube to 8 rnds. or...
Attach a bipod to your rifle.

There.

You're in "open".
 
Different topic, but sponsorship has more to do with return on investment than your skill.
Plenty of people get stuff from companies and can't hit the broad side of a barn.
They can however turn people's attention to that company's products and convert sales.

True. I have never looked into that aspect :) We should pen a book 'The Joy of Shooting'
 
People shoot in open class for many different reasons.
Some guys just like using certain gear (like a red-dot on their shotgun) that puts them into that category.
Or maybe the only shotgun that they own happens to have a ported barrel.

Nobody is forced to spend any more money than they want to.

Also;

Every match posts two sets of scores.

First they show the overall scores; With everyone shown on the same score-sheet.
And then they show the division scores; With everyone separated by divisions.

You can then decide for yourself which score-sheet you want to pay attention to, depending on what equipment you used.
 
I don't want to spend the cash on an open division pistol.

the DVC open is $5,800 while the DVC 3gun is $4,300.

Why did you pick the most expensive and obscure pistols for price comparison?

How many people drop that much cash on a handgun, in either division?

Most average folks pay between $700 to $1000 for a pistol.
And almost any handgun can have a C-more sight added for less than $400.
 
I know I am not an expert in this sport, I do have an interest in the sport as soon as a am able to acquire a rifle, I think I will give it a try.

I am not a young man any more and I am going to take and use every whiz bang gizmo available to me. I guess that would put me in open.
I know I may not win over all, I may finish some where in the basement or some where in between. Will i be able to answer, did I have fun? If I can answer
with a resounding yes, then it was worth it.

The bottom line is fun, bring what you have and enjoy the day on the range with like minded people.
 
I watched a former open ipsc shooter who got tired of the money for the arms race destroy the stock class with a basic 9mm(forget the make). I shot a comp gun once; was like shooting a laser gun compared to my stock gun. Problem was, everyone in my class had a "laser gun". I didn't place any better, just lots more money in play. Optics would make the only big difference; back then my eyes were great, 20 yrs changes things.
 
I know I am not an expert in this sport, I do have an interest in the sport as soon as a am able to acquire a rifle, I think I will give it a try.

I am not a young man any more and I am going to take and use every whiz bang gizmo available to me. I guess that would put me in open.
I know I may not win over all, I may finish some where in the basement or some where in between. Will i be able to answer, did I have fun? If I can answer
with a resounding yes, then it was worth it.

The bottom line is fun, bring what you have and enjoy the day on the range with like minded people.

My exact thought as well
 
Why did you pick the most expensive and obscure pistols for price comparison?

How many people drop that much cash on a handgun, in either division?

Most average folks pay between $700 to $1000 for a pistol.
And almost any handgun can have a C-more sight added for less than $400.

You are absolutely correct. That's why I put on the low end rmr.

And yes, I did say if you want to shoot open for fun, it's a no-brainer, do it.

But I am also saying, like in the clip below, Dan Bedall shoots the stage with what seems like a continual stream of .38. When I think open, I think of shooting like Dan, and having the equipment to enable me shoot like him, on top of the countless hours practicing to be that good in the first place. But, that's just me. How many hours would it take to get to that level? Anyone?

 
Listening to some of the 3 Gun Nation pro interviews, the top competitors are burning at least a thousand rounds a week to maintain the top level.

Most of the guys interviewed stated 50, 000 rounds a year for 2 to 3 years prior to making it to the top.
 
Back
Top Bottom