OPEN LETTER to Members of the Media

Some great information shared by the CSSA - The Canadian Shooting Sports Association in their Team CSSA E-News sent out yesterday. Read and share friends!
.
.
.
OPEN LETTER to Members of the Media and to all those running for Elected Office.

The CSSA is compelled to write this open letter to all of you because your lack of firearms knowledge is so bad you’re embarrassing yourselves. The following facts are presented for your edification.

• The “AR” in “AR-15” rifle does NOT stand for “assault rifle” or “automatic rifle.” It stands for ArmaLite Rifle, after the company that developed it in the 1950s.

• The small box that ammunition is stored in to be inserted into the firearm is called a magazine, not a clip. To make it easy, just remember a clip is for your hair, a magazine is for a firearm.

• There are no assault rifles in Canada, they have been totally banned in Canada since the early 1970s. As defined by the U.S. Army, an assault rifle is a rifle with an intermediate range cartridge, a large-capacity detachable magazine, and selective fire capability. Selective fire means the gun can fire full automatic like a machine gun, or a single shot per trigger press, like all other semi-automatics.

• There is no such thing as an “assault weapon.” The term “assault weapon” was created by the U.S. gun control organization – the Violence Policy Center – for the sole purpose of muddying the waters between assault rifles (see above) and sporting firearms. There is no legal definition of “assault weapon” in Canada.

• The C-8 Police Patrol Carbine is an AR-15 with a fancy name. Same gun. Same ammunition. It is absolutely no different than any other AR-15 except for the fancy name. Police may use high-capacity magazines forbidden to civilians, and certain police units may also use C-8s capable of full-automatic fire, making these true assault rifles.

• Semi-automatic rifles in Canada do not have large capacity magazines. They are, by law, limited to 5 rounds.

• Lawful firearms owners are subject to a de facto RCMP background check once per day. This is performed by a program the RCMP calls Continuous Eligibility Screening. From the RCMP’s website:

• Continuous eligibility screening of firearms licence holders. Under the continuous eligibility regime, at any point during an individual's licence validity period, an event could occur that could prompt a review of their eligibility to hold a firearms licence. The Canadian Firearms Information System (CFIS) contains current and historical firearms licence holder data. If a firearm licence holder is involved in an event which could affect their eligibility (as defined by section 5 of the Firearms Act), it is reported by law enforcement via the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) database and sent to the relevant CFO for review. An event can also be registered by individuals using the CFP's 1-800 number. A CFO is authorized to investigate the incident to determine if the client remains eligible to hold a licence.

• Those people prohibited from possessing firearms by the courts (firearm prohibition order) i.e. the bad guys, are not tracked by any police or corrections organization in Canada. That “privilege” is reserved only for those individuals who take the safety course, pass the test and background checks by the RCMP. (See Continuous Eligibility Screening above.)

• Canada’s firearms legislative framework is one of the strongest in the world. An individual must take a course, pass an exam (both written and practical), pass background investigations by several levels of police, provide 2 references, and wait for months to receive a firearms license.

• Persons wishing to acquire restricted firearms (like handguns or AR-15s) must take 2 courses and 2 exams, and pass even more stringent background checks and their firearms must be registered.

• Restricted firearms, such as handguns and AR-15s, may only be fired on federally-licensed shooting ranges. Transport permits are required to take these firearms to the range and home again. Any other movement of these firearms must be accompanied by the appropriate permit.

• All firearms owners must report a change of address within 30 days or face a possible jail sentence of 2 years. They must also pass daily background checks (see Continuous Eligibility Screening above). No such requirement exists for violent offenders on parole, for those prohibited from possessing firearms or for convicted pedophiles because the Supreme Court said such requirements would violate their civil rights.

• The AR-15 is NOT a powerful firearm. The power of a firearm does not come from the firearm itself, but from the ammunition cartridge it fires. The cartridge fired by the AR-15 – the 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington, is so weak that most jurisdictions in North America prohibit its use for deer hunting. The cartridge was designed to be small, light and accurate, not powerful.

• Handguns are not permitted for use for hunting, not because they are not suitable for hunting, but because of government decree. It’s legal to hunt with handguns in many countries around the world, including most states in America.

• Semi-automatic firearms are not new to Canada. Semi-automatic pistols were common prior to 1900, and the first semi-automatic hunting rifle was manufactured by Winchester in 1907. Four hundred thousand of these were sold before WWII and were produced into the 1950s. Semi-automatic firearms continue to be popular today for hunting and target shooting of all types. A semi-automatic firearm is NOT a machine gun, nor is it any deadlier than any other type of firearm.

• Conversion of a civilian semi-automatic firearm to full-automatic fire is not a simple task. It requires specific parts illegal in Canada, great technical skill and machining tools. It's also against the law - a person convicted of converting a firearm to full automatic is subject to a 3-year jail term.

• Military Specifications: a firearm that is built to military specifications means it was built by the lowest bidder and to the minimum quality standard the military was willing to accept. Commercially manufactured firearms are built to much higher quality standards.

• Optical sights do not make a firearm more deadly – they make the target easier to see. In 2019, most rifles – of all types – have optical sights.

• The overwhelming majority of handguns used in crime are not sourced in Canada. The Toronto Police Service, the only police force tracking this information, shows only 18.6% of firearms used in crime originated in Canada. Only 9.4% of those were ever in the Canadian Firearms Registry. That means the remaining 9.2% were stolen from police or military services or were unregistered long guns used for criminal purposes. And since the vast majority of criminal shootings are done with handguns, we can assume the number of long guns is extremely small. Did you know, any firearm that is unsuccessfully traced automatically is put into the “originated in Canada” number?

• Neither StatsCan, the Canadian Firearms Program nor the RCMP track the source of firearms used in crime, not even the firearms owned by police agencies and the military.

We appreciate that journalists and those running for elected office cannot know everything about everything.

If there is information you don't understand about firearms, the odds are that we do! Please contact us at info@cssa-cila.org and we will help you.
.
.
.
Give the CSSA - The Canadian Shooting Sports Association a follow and subscribe to their newsletter if you want to receive more information like this right to your inbox!
 
It's about time someone sets them straight. I can't stand it when the Liberals keep talking about banning something that is basically undefined! Especially when it comes from Mr. Blair.
 
Great, we're telling them the same thing that they know and willingly choose to ignore.

Shall we make another, more strongly-worded open letter hoping that the point gets across? I'm thinking we'll have to do about a dozen before one of these points gets corrected.
 
I think I will send a copy of this to Mayor Bowman.

Your letter is worth 57 cents, their hidden agenda behind gun control are worth billion of dollars.

Eliminate the hidden agenda, then there will be no un reasonable gun control
 
Well written but I believe you are making an assumption that 9.2% are stolen from the military or police. Its more than likely that the firearms are stolen from distributors or firearms suppliers prior to registration. There have been a number of gun shops in Alberta that have had a staggering amount of firearms stolen due to there absolute lack of proper security.

Do firearms get stolen from the military, im sure they do. Im also sure police have firearms stolen but since most services dont allow off duty carry, it is not likely to account for 9.2%. Police would also have every gun reported stolen which again would not contribute to the 9.2%.

Police commonly see sawed off (at one time legally owned) rifles or shotguns because some gun owners leave guns in vehicles or in cheap safes. Most handguns are coming illegally over the boarder or police through canadians with valid pals that get paid off to illegally traffic firearms after they report them as stolen.

The gun laws in this country make no sense. An AR is not a dangerous weapon. The government simply continues to push a false agenda with zero knowledge.
 
well written letter, but they wont read that, there is too much facts and logic, they will throw it away and continue right on drumming up fear in the sheep
 
This should be run in news papers with additional information about how few crimes gun owners commit.
 
I expect zero media attention on this. And even less (as in yeah, negative) attention on this from relative elected/to be elected officials. Logical just isn't print worthy these days.
 
I tell all my non shooting friends, co-workers, and anyone else who will listen that the U.S. narrative that the anti-gunners use is
not applicable in Canada. I'm one of the most vetted people in the country. When I talk to them they start seeing what a bunch
of sh## the left is trying to heep on them. Let everyone you know that this is a gang problem and not a legal gun owner's.
 
It's about time someone sets them straight. I can't stand it when the Liberals keep talking about banning something that is basically undefined! Especially when it comes from Mr. Blair.

Billy B liar is totally in the loop with regards to this stuff. He just doesn't give a rodents arse about being honest.
 
Back
Top Bottom