I got 3 and very happy with it, there is nothing wrong with Tikka T3 for long range, quite a bit nicer quality out of the box comparing to rem700, and shoot very well too.
I probably wouldn't go with the .270 based on the fact that there is little in the way of bullet selection for the calibre compared to others.
I am sorry....I have pondered rebarreling a Remington....but you nailed it.Remingtons quality has gone ....down...down...down...I know they are competing with an open market of "cheaper" guns...but when you pay a 1000.00 for plastic and pot metal..it sort of hurts!!
I have seen the 270 do AMAZING things at long range with just your run of the mill bullets..
I have a artical in a American Rifleman(I think) that the 270 in its early years was used as a bench rest caliber and was very popular at the time...I think the year was 1955ish...I THINK!!
I know it is alittle out of the Zombie preparness hand book guidelines....But I am not going to share my ammo
![]()
I have a artical in a American Rifleman(I think) that the 270 in its early years was used as a bench rest caliber and was very popular at the time...I think the year was 1955ish...I THINK!!
It's not 1955 anymore.![]()
I am surprised that the 277 caliber hasn't caught on, like the 6.5's the 6.8's seem to be a good combo of weight for bc. What is the twist rate of the tikka? You'd have a winner if the gun can stabilize matrix's 165 and/or 175 grain vlds.