Do you think ATRS went a bridge to far with there modern series? I mean do you think that if they stuck to there modern hunter and varmint that they might have flown under the radar due to the high price and low volume of there "boutique" gun? Was it so, or was it inevitable that they would end up in the rcmp's net?
Opinion? Was it one bridge to far?
- Thread starter rally guy
- Start date
Short answer, probably. I think ATRS would agree as well.
It doesn't matter in the slightest, though.
The longer answer would be, it was always the intention to ban certain makes and models of firearms, one class at a time.
Poly and the anti gunners have been screaming at the top of their lungs for 30 years. They seen a chance captain Cuck would carry on his daddy's work, and they were right.
Make absolutely no mistake about it; the end goal is for all firearms to be stripped from any and all private citizens hands, period.
As mentioned, one class at a time.
This doesn't matter if it requires no compensation, lies, vilify in the media, stat hacking, threats of violence, or even actual violence to achieve this.
It doesn't matter in the slightest, though.
The longer answer would be, it was always the intention to ban certain makes and models of firearms, one class at a time.
Poly and the anti gunners have been screaming at the top of their lungs for 30 years. They seen a chance captain Cuck would carry on his daddy's work, and they were right.
Make absolutely no mistake about it; the end goal is for all firearms to be stripped from any and all private citizens hands, period.
As mentioned, one class at a time.
This doesn't matter if it requires no compensation, lies, vilify in the media, stat hacking, threats of violence, or even actual violence to achieve this.
Last edited:
when will gun owners accept the fact that all these rifles we never thought wee would see as NR..... were approved by the firearms lab in a scheme to financially ruin both gun owners and businesses once the planned OIC came down.
all part of the liberal master plan
all part of the liberal master plan
Only once you realize that civilian disarmament is the goal does it all make sense.
steamy teabag
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Inside Carneys Reich
What were they suppose to do. Get Poly and the Wendy to sign off and approve on the design before manufacturing.
sillymike
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Yup... That would probably explain why they are able to ban firearm as a "variant" of another restricted/prohibited firearms...
- Even though there are no legal/technical definition of what constitute a variant.
BenchrestJohn
CGN Regular
- Location
- Maple Ridge, BC
They were made in Canada. Guilty. If it was Chinese 7.63x39 you still be shooting.
nowarningshot
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Only two choices on your poll. Both could have been written by a government lawyer or guisling. Try adding a few more choices, from the dog taking the human for a walk perspective.
I'm still laughing at the 5 people who voted yes. There are actually people out there who believe the socialists will let them keep their bolt action hunting rifles.
Socialist/communist dictators don't give up power democratically, history is crystal clear on that. Take away the guns and you take away the threat of losing power. And bolt action rifles can absolutely remove a dictatorship. Rocks can't.
Socialist/communist dictators don't give up power democratically, history is crystal clear on that. Take away the guns and you take away the threat of losing power. And bolt action rifles can absolutely remove a dictatorship. Rocks can't.
