Opinions on Savage model 16 International hunter XP

7.62Nato

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
169   0   0
I'm looking for honest opinions on the savage model 16 international hunter xp. I would like to pick one up in 308win. Are they as accurate as the axis? How is the mag? Any issues with these rifles? I'm probably going to switch out the scope eventually so I dont mind it for now until funds can be saved. I really like the Axis and the way it shoots so I'm hoping the accuracy would be on par. That is the only Savage I've ever had so dont know much about Savages. Any help or info appreciated!;)
 
If I'm not mistaken, the 16 is the stainless version of the 11/111. I have the 11/111 Trophy Hunter package in .223 and I love it! I just recently got it though, but it seems fairly accurate. I have only put about 30 rounds through it so far. I am looking to get a 30.06 in the same rifle. No regrets here.
 
I have the international trophy hunter 111 in .30-06. I love the accutrigger. Scope seems decent. I'm hitting what i point at and the scope held its zero through a hunting season. Haven't had that one out since the fall.
 
This is pasted from another forum that I posted in earlier. Just change "111 to 116" and you're set. Obviously some of the comments were directed at members of another forum:

As I alluded to earlier, there are new versions of the 11/111 which are totally different from the previous versions. The new Trophy Hunter version comes with a stock that's meant to look like an accustock but isn't. It does have the accustock bolt release system though and the plastic trigger guard which holds it in place broke on my sample.

It doesn't have the traditional magazines for the 11/111 but rather it uses the magazines from the Savage Axis! Plastic release!

The barrel nut is different, etc.

I would avoid these models.

I have one and they are not what they are cracked up to be.

The finish on the bolt face is horrendously bad.

During feeding, the action sticks on my sample for no apparent reason after the cartridge is already in the chamber 80% of the way. It requires a good shove to close completely. Some other savage rifles that I've owned/handled including a 111 FCXP didn't have this problem. This speaks to their consistency and QC.

The extractor is not as strong as, say, the M16 style in a Howa action et al or a Mauser design. It flings the cases limply from the chamber and there have been units that have shipped from the factory as defective.

Also, the bases were not to spec and made mounting zee rings IMPOSSIBLE. I verified this with calipers. So, I had to remove them but they used a thread locker at the factory and the heads of the soft screws were not strong enough to remove the glued-in screws. I had to tap deeply into the screws to remove them!

The scope base holes which are drilled into the receiver were not in line with the bore or even each other on the sample that I had so lapping was required.

The rings are no good either, they were not made well and the scope was not in line with the bore.

Once I replaced the bases and rings, lapped and leveled, things were better. The stock rings are too high, too.

Be careful to examine the rifle carefully before you take it home. My sample has both of the turret caps cross threaded and basically destroyed by the gorilla who bore sighted the scope at the factory. It was nowhere near level.

Also, you'll almost need to purchase a short action version. The Savage long action is longer than any other manufacturer's Magnum Length action. It's ridiculous. This is because Savage cuts corners with the alignment of their chambers and bores and the quality of their fit with the receiver. So, they need a floating bolt head etc which ads to the length. A Sako or Tikka it ain't as they use precision and quality of manufacture to get their accuracy. This is much the same way that the trigger isn't a fine tuned piece that breaks clean at a low weight. They can be that way, yes. Sometimes they trip when the bolt is closed hard on some samples. It's a mass produced mixed bag with no real QC. That is the purpose behind the accu-trigger's center blade. It allows Savage to set the trigger to a weight that may or may not be safe (in any other rifle) and rely on the safety blade to prevent any accidents.

So, if you do plan to buy a 11/111 trophy hunter you'll need:
-bases
-rings
-the ability to tap those screw heads
-a scope level kit
-A replacement metal trigger guard and bolt release from savage
-a backup magazine as the plastic one is C-H-E-A-P and will probably break at the worst time.

Or you could just buy something like a Vanguard Series 2 with the low Talley Vanguard rings and be really happy.

If you are stuck on a 111 I would try to get a hold of an FCNS or even an older 111 FCXP if you can find one. I had an FCXP which hadn't had the brown residue from the bluing process completely tumbled off at the factory. How embarrassing for them. It shot well though and had bottom metal rather than plastic and a metal magazine. Clearly superior to the current 'trophy hunter' version.



Here's what it looks like after I applied all the fixes and replaced the scope after sending the other away for warranty work. Note the Savage Axis magazine.


picture upload


how to screenshot on windows
 
Last edited:
Either that guy is a troll or he got the worst savage ever made

I have never had a bad one yet, but you have to know they are made to be used not necesarily admired
 
Either that guy is a troll or he got the worst savage ever made

I have never had a bad one yet, but you have to know they are made to be used not necesarily admired

I've had a few savages. All have had defects in one way or another. Incomplete bluing, warped receivers, misaligned scope base holes, bad triggers. Both of the kit guns had the same problems with the rings and bases.

They are cheap firearms that sell for more than they are worth.
 
I've heard a lot of good things about savages and this is the first Ive heard of them having issues like these. I will keep it in mind though. Not a fan of the plastic mag but the axis mag held fine, as well as its rings and bases which look like the above pics. Cheapo bushnell sharpshooter also held zero fine as well. I'm gonna head out today and handle one myself.
 
Wow...your axis came with three position burris bases and burris zee rings? Sorry - they don't look ANYTHING like the above pics. The pics are of the rifle FIXED.

Sorry after looking again, I was wrong but mine did hold, both rings and bases. Did not touch anything from factory. You got a lemon for sure. If you keep having issues and having to fix, why buy another?????
 
Re-read your posts. You said you have had several savages, you tell me what to look for meaning you probably know what your talking about yet you keep getting melons..so where do miss everything when checking them out before buying? You say all kits have issues with rings and bases. Like i said i will keep it in mind. Opinion appreciated but will check it out tonite.
 
The reason I know what to look for is because I got the lemons. They've all had their issues in different ways.

The bases and rings are just cheap crap - they're not defective, per-se. They are out of spec, and non-concentric and too high though.

Edit: this thread has prompted me to pull out the rifle in question. I figured out the reason that the bolt was sticking. If you're still pushing up slightly on the bolt while you are closing it, the leading edge of the bolt face will catch on the edge of the chamber. It doesn't seem like a factory defect, it seems to be another failure in design.

These things are a bit of a joke.
 
Last edited:
ALBERTA BOY, just a few comments from a rookie user. You cant compare this rifle at $550 with a scope to rifles from Tikka or Sako or even the Weatherby which start at $800 (Tikka) or $1200 (Sako) with no scope included. They are what they are and if you can afford the higher priced ones, by all means get them. If you compare them to similarly priced models, they compare very favourably from what I've seen and there isn't much you can get for the same price that would come out ahead. Are there going to be some with problems? Sure, every company makes lemons. And if you're comparing the Savage to a Tikka or Sako you're going to find the fit and finish and attention to detail in the higher priced models to be vastly superior. This doesn't mean these rifles are garbage, just means they should cost less, and they do. I'd love to have bought a Tikka, unfortunately the price put them out of my reach for now. I haven't been able to compare the Weatherby because no one around here stocks them, but they start at $600 with no scope, so they are still more expensive.
 
ALBERTA BOY, just a few comments from a rookie user. You cant compare this rifle at $550 with a scope to rifles from Tikka or Sako or even the Weatherby which start at $800 (Tikka) or $1200 (Sako) with no scope included. They are what they are and if you can afford the higher priced ones, by all means get them. If you compare them to similarly priced models, they compare very favourably from what I've seen and there isn't much you can get for the same price that would come out ahead. Are there going to be some with problems? Sure, every company makes lemons. And if you're comparing the Savage to a Tikka or Sako you're going to find the fit and finish and attention to detail in the higher priced models to be vastly superior. This doesn't mean these rifles are garbage, just means they should cost less, and they do. I'd love to have bought a Tikka, unfortunately the price put them out of my reach for now. I haven't been able to compare the Weatherby because no one around here stocks them, but they start at $600 with no scope, so they are still more expensive.

The weatherby is $550 which is the same price as the savage. The scope on them is worth $0. Trust me, I have one. It's crap. So are the rings and bases. Take them right out of the equation.

The Vanguards are stocked EVERYWHERE around here and you know what? They ship.

Also, your other prices are OUT TO LUNCH.
 
The weatherby is $550 which is the same price as the savage. The scope on them is worth $0. Trust me, I have one. It's crap. So are the rings and bases. Take them right out of the equation.

The Vanguards are stocked EVERYWHERE around here and you know what? They ship.

Also, your other prices are OUT TO LUNCH.

A Weatherby S2 is $590 at WWS or $599 at Cabelas in the Synthetic/Blued. The Savage Int Trophy hunter is $509 at WWS and $549 at Cabelas. Lets try and get our facts straight!

The fact is that the vast majority of Savage owners are very happy with them. Most people agree that they are not the prettiest synthetic stocks, but they shoot and function well for the price they can be had for. I own three and although I'm not a huge fan of them I do appreciate them for what they are.

From what I've read the Weatherby is also a great rifle for the price.

George
 
Last edited:
A Weatherby S2 is $590 at WWS or $599 at Cabelas in the Synthetic/Blued. The Savage Int Trophy hunter is $509 at WWS and $549 at Cabelas. Lets try and get our facts straight!

The fact is that the vast majority of Savage owners are very happy with them. Most people agree that they are not the prettiest synthetic stocks, but they shoot and function well for the price they can be had for. I own three and although I'm not a huge fan of them I do appreciate them for what they are.

From what I've read the Weatherby is also a great rifle for the price.

George

Agreed.

I'm not trying to start a fight ALBERTA BOY. Calm down. It seems like you have had a very bad experience with yours. To say the scope is crap is a bit of a stretch. For a newbie like me, on a tight budget it's adequate. When the scope becomes the limiting factor in my shooting, then I will look at upgrading. For now I can't out-shoot the scope so it is just fine. A few years down the road I am hoping to upgrade both the rifle and the scope, but for now what kept me out of shooting and hunting for a long time was the cost of getting into it. This rifle is fine as an entry level rifle, and I've read many reviews from experienced hunters and shooters that have confirmed this for me. Yours is the first I've read that has been this negative and regardless of whether or not you think my prices are out to lunch, the fact is Tikkas and Sakos are more expensive. I think if you talked to everyone that owned the Weatherby model you have suggested you'd find someone equally as negative about them.
 
Back
Top Bottom