Optimum barrel length for .22LR?

No, I took your post as offering arguments that a longer barrel would be more accurate. Maybe I am misunderstanding what you were trying to say?

Oh, I didn't really type this part of my thought process clearly. Here's what I was thinking at the time:

First, we see that long barrels slow the bullet down in rimfires.
Second, we know that longer barrels usually aren't as accurate as shorter ones.

However, all the super accurate rimfire target rifles I've seen wear a 20+" barrel. My BRNO mod 4 target has a 28" if I remember correctly.

Now usually, long barrels on centerfire rifles are to use enough powder to get enough velocity. Target rifles seem to try to use the shortest barrels possible to have a stiff, accurate barrel while getting the velocity they need. Tradeoff.

Now in rimfires, why would there be a barrel that is both a reduction in velocity and a detriment to accuracy?

I postulate that it's because of the low power nature of the .22, the barrel vibrations are easier to tune (right brand of ammo or a barrel tuner) when the barrel is longer.

That's what my post was summing up.
 
I would attribute the long barrel length to the days of open sights (I know they are still used as well). The distance between the sights would help maximize the accuracy irons can afford.
 
I have shot a lot of different manufacturer's .22s and many different barrel lengths also. For the paper shooters and velocity jargon people I do not fathom the equasions at all. My experience is based on actual field shooting and occasional paper shooting to set a scope. For the shooting I do (a few bricks a week) at gophers at 75 to 200 yards, I found the 24 inch barrels the best for distances between 75 and 150. Shorter 20 inch out to 100 and 27 out to 200. this is with regular bulk ammo as it knocks them down as well as the higher prices ammo. Different opinions create interesting discussions.
 
Back
Top Bottom