P*** off the Canadian Goverment Buy handgun for $47 shipped!!

Why would I buy this when I could put that $50 towards a full functioning restricted firearm instead of a paperweight? This sounds like a way to make a quick buck if anything.
 
So if Trudeau Bans, I could end up owning a lot of stripped lowers should the RCMP bust down my door to terrorize myself and my family to get the handles I like to buy.
One day I'd like to finish up building the rest of a Glock, CZ, Berretta etc... from all of those lower pieces of metal.
 
I don't know that i would be in for this specifically, but I have spent $100 for the same reason, so $50 would be an even easier decision
 
Funny to see some one selling a bunch of them. I am actually donating my two stripped pistol frames to handgunless RPAL holders.

For the people wondering, finding the parts for less than the cost of just buying a complete tokarev don't exist, I tried. Maybe that will change one day. Tradex did once sell tokarev parts kits.

This truly is just a middle finger to trudeau
 
Way back in the day Trail Firearms had the same kind of deal to piss off the Allan Rock band of idiots in the government by offering 1903 FN frames for about $15 plus shipping. I still have mine.
It makes a great paperweight as well as a political statement, especially since it has a trigger lock on it for which the keys have gone missing years ago.
I laugh inside very time I play with it.
Screw mindless politicians.
 
JHEDSY - The point is to increase the number of firearms and thus the affected number of voters.

JT - "Our new legislation to take another step to full firearm confiscation will piss off anyone with XX gun. How many of these peopel are there?"
RG - "18"
JT - "Go nuts"

vs

JT - "Our new legislation to take another step to full firearm confiscation will piss off anyone with XX gun. How many of these peopel are there?"
RG - "1,800,000"
JT - "hmmm, we may want to think this through a little more"

Is the basic idea behind it. Essentially a show of solidarity to the firearms community as well. By owning something restricted you have bought into the affected group of people in a tangible way. Even if all I want to own is a single barrel break action 410 for hunting twice a year I am still opposed to increased regulation for law abiding firearms owners, and for $50 I can actively put my name into that group. There is an argument that it is waste of time and only helps stores selling stripped frames, but year or two ago the media, anti-gun groups and prohibitionist politicians were going off about the increase in numbers of restricted firearms like it heralded Armageddon, which is weird because it meant a bunch of people were complying with existing laws.

I don't know if that answers your question in a meaningful way, but it is your money to spend or not.
 
Hyllar said:
JHEDSY - The point is to increase the number of firearms and thus the affected number of voters.

JT - "Our new legislation to take another step to full firearm confiscation will piss off anyone with XX gun. How many of these peopel are there?"
RG - "18"
JT - "Go nuts"

vs

JT - "Our new legislation to take another step to full firearm confiscation will piss off anyone with XX gun. How many of these peopel are there?"
RG - "1,800,000"
JT - "hmmm, we may want to think this through a little more"

Is the basic idea behind it. Essentially a show of solidarity to the firearms community as well. By owning something restricted you have bought into the affected group of people in a tangible way. Even if all I want to own is a single barrel break action 410 for hunting twice a year I am still opposed to increased regulation for law abiding firearms owners, and for $50 I can actively put my name into that group. There is an argument that it is waste of time and only helps stores selling stripped frames, but year or two ago the media, anti-gun groups and prohibitionist politicians were going off about the increase in numbers of restricted firearms like it heralded Armageddon, which is weird because it meant a bunch of people were complying with existing laws.

I don't know if that answers your question in a meaningful way, but it is your money to spend or not.
Click to expand...

Fantastic explanation. I might steal this and spread it around accordingly
 
Gnome75 said:
Fantastic explanation. I might steal this and spread it around accordingly
Click to expand...

Not to mention the transfers require a government worker to actually do some work. Perhaps a little dig at the process and some ROI on your tax dollars. LOL
 
Hyllar said:
JHEDSY - The point is to increase the number of firearms and thus the affected number of voters.

JT - "Our new legislation to take another step to full firearm confiscation will piss off anyone with XX gun. How many of these peopel are there?"
RG - "18"
JT - "Go nuts"

vs

JT - "Our new legislation to take another step to full firearm confiscation will piss off anyone with XX gun. How many of these peopel are there?"
RG - "1,800,000"
JT - "hmmm, we may want to think this through a little more"

Is the basic idea behind it. Essentially a show of solidarity to the firearms community as well. By owning something restricted you have bought into the affected group of people in a tangible way. Even if all I want to own is a single barrel break action 410 for hunting twice a year I am still opposed to increased regulation for law abiding firearms owners, and for $50 I can actively put my name into that group. There is an argument that it is waste of time and only helps stores selling stripped frames, but year or two ago the media, anti-gun groups and prohibitionist politicians were going off about the increase in numbers of restricted firearms like it heralded Armageddon, which is weird because it meant a bunch of people were complying with existing laws.

I don't know if that answers your question in a meaningful way, but it is your money to spend or not.
Click to expand...

Ahhhhhhh got it. I already own 4 restricted firearms lol. I was thinking to myself "what on earth would I buy a stripped lower for? A paper weight?" But I understand now that you guys are trying to bump up the number of restricted firearms quantity the cheapest way possible with people who have their RPAL but no restricted firearms yet.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if this would be registered as a handgun or a stripped receiver?
Anyways, a useless piece of metal ... make a statement and buy something you can enjoy at the range.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom