mm, not really. i didn't say anything about the Para, i'm only commenting on the Norc. i've heard of the problems some people have had with their Para, but percentage-wise i've heard as many or more people say that if someone is buying a Norc they should get the ArmCo tuned version.
the point being that ANY pistol that needs 30% to 50% extra be spent on it to get it running right is not really a good pistol.
i've never shot a Para and don't know many people who actually own one except one person at the range who has commented that it sometimes FTE the .45ACP rounds. the person also noted that the ejection port is the same size as on the 9mm version, so either the port is too small or there's user error (excessive limp-wristing)
you gotta hand it to Para that they DO have some great designs - as far as in know, next to no other mfg actually offers a double-stack 1911 in .45ACP or .40S&W for that matter. there's Para, there's Norc *cough*, and i think BUL. for a platform that's been around for 100 years, how NOBODY saw the potential until recently is beyond me...
but back to this poll.... hmm, i'd take a Para if we're talking one of their unique pieces like S16-40, P14-45, Warthog, ...