. How much difference is there between the 1873 and the 1874? Part of the reason I ask is I'm 'working' on obtaining the following one from a shooting buddy of mine. As it stands at present, I have the loan of it
Always wondered about those. They sure are expensive! I have an original rifle, and it's one of my favourites. Didn't cost as much as the replica, either.
The 73's are a trapdoor Springfield replica, and the 74's are a Sharps side hammer replica. The Sharps is a much stronger action, but the Springfields are fun to play with. I wouldn't go beyond std BP ballistics with one though. - dan
Sir, and all - Pedersoli's Sharps rifles are proofed for ALL .45-70 Gubmint loads, up to and including the standard 300gr JHP nitro-loads. So are their Trapdoor replications.
The older Harrington & Richardson replicas - rifle and carbine - are not so proofed, and are recommended to be shot only with BP loads with lead bullets only, although you CAN shoot the heavier 405gr bullet.
The 73's are a trapdoor Springfield replica, and the 74's are a Sharps side hammer replica. The Sharps is a much stronger action, but the Springfields are fun to play with. I wouldn't go beyond std BP ballistics with one though. - dan
Thanks for the basic description difference between the two
. I've never paid much attention to either until I got the long term 'loan' of the one pictured earlier.I think that is a bit misleading; factory made 45-70 shells are loaded so that they can be shot in all rifles including trapdoors whether original or not (assuming in good repair). I am not sure whether that statement applies to the new leverution shells with light bullets and much higher velocities.
The important thing to note is that loading tables have three levels of loading with the lowest levels being for trapdoor springfields. Sharps rifles both original and modern have a stronger design but the sharp corners where the sides of the receiver sort of wraps around the breach block I think would make them less strong than say a Ruger # 1 where the sides of the receiver come straight back.
cheers mooncoon
Sir, and all - Pedersoli's Sharps rifles are proofed for ALL .45-70 Gubmint loads, up to and including the standard 300gr JHP nitro-loads. So are their Trapdoor replications.
The older Harrington & Richardson replicas - rifle and carbine - are not so proofed, and are recommended to be shot only with BP loads with lead bullets only, although you CAN shoot the heavier 405gr bullet.
tac
The original trapdoors were percussion and paper cartridge, and then converted to cartridge, 50-70 if memory serves (been a while since I played with one). 45-70 came later yet. They are a pretty weak action, as I've said. Regular factory ammo is loaded to pressures usable in even these weak actions, for liability reasons. There are some hot 45-70 loads out there, but they have disclaimers on the boxes usually. You can load with smokeless powders, but you need to be careful. Read Ken waters multi part articles on 45-70's and their various strengths. BP is fun, and safe in these guns, but in a trapdoor, even that can cause problems once the fouling gets too bad. The Sharps is definitely a step up in action strength, and yes, a Ruger is stronger then that. One of the strongest of the old actions is the Remington rolling block, which makes a nice 45-70 (or 50-70 as i have). FWIW - dan
Sir - the instructions with the Harrington & Richardson Trapdoor replicas categorically state that they are suitable for lead bullets only - NOT for jacketed ammunition.
That was then, try the same exercise now.
tac



























