I shoot to hit and kill, sometimes I miss, it happens. I haven't lost a wolf or coyote yet, but I tend to "overgun" by most people's standards.
Higher standard means that many put wolves on an undeserved pedestal. They see no issue with a "kill-em-all" attitude toward coyotes, but at the same time adopt a "save-the-wolf" belief. I don't consider them any more or less of a nuisance in certain situations than other varmints or predators. They can be detrimental to livestock and wildlife and need to be kept in check. The areas I hunt and work in house both wildlife and livestock, hence the reason I shoot every one I see.
It's common to get responses like yours when the term "wolf" comes up, which proves my point.
What is that, exactly?
My point is that I don't automatically try to kill something just because it is what it is. I have no "kill-em-all" attitude to anything. Your point is what?
