Picatinny scope rings for Ruger 10/22

C

christos808

Member
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Location
Niagara Region
Hi everyone,

So I recently upgraded my 10/22 with a new receiver/barrel combo from Dlask. The receiver has an integral picatinny rail that looks fantastic. I'm ready to mount my scope on it but the cheap rings I got at Bass Pro when I first bought the gun a year ago look kind of flimsy now, and I'd like to upgrade to a genuine picatinny set of rings. Problem is, I can't seem to find any that are not picatinny/weaver.

Does anyone know where I can find a set of rings made for a picatinny rail (not weaver) that would be appropriate for a rimfire rifle? Does anyone have any experience with this?

Thanks
 
these are the 30mm rings i went with. http://www(dot)amazon(dot)ca/gp/pro...&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00

they look great and were one of the few low rings i could find. one issues you are going to have is finding rings low enough. there is a lot of material on the top of the dlask receiver (i have one too) and to get a decent cheek weld you need to get the scope as low as possible. i wont claim that they are the best quality rings in existence but they were the best bang for your buck overall that i could find. i specifically wanted/needed:
- 30mm rings
- low height
- i wanted at least 4 screws
- picatinny compatable of course

also you can use weaver rings on picatinny rails. not the other way around. just make sure you press them forward as you torque down the rings (which you would always do anyways). depending on your stock and if you are willing to use a cheek pad i would consider the burris signature rings. the only catch is that the lowest height you can find is medium.
 
I used the 1" high Picatinny 6 hole ring by Weaver. Not sure if they are the same height as the ones Margucci used. I only have the stock receiver, so my 2-7x34 sits nice and low.

IMG_0289.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0289.jpg
    IMG_0289.jpg
    41.4 KB · Views: 57
stilty said:
I used the 1" high Picatinny 6 hole ring by Weaver. Not sure if they are the same height as the ones Margucci used. I only have the stock receiver, so my 2-7x34 sits nice and low.

View attachment 31564
Click to expand...

those are essentially the same rings i have but i think mine are a little lower. the dlask receivers have extra material on the top so the scope is mounted higher. even with the lowest rings i can find i would still like it to be slightly lower. although currently it is acceptable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom