Pinned Beowulf mag?

Those ASC mags are designed to only hold single stacks of .450, they have the singles stack follower and the plates on the inside so .223 or x39 can't double stack or catch the wider feed lips.

Those are iirc the only ones the RCMP have come out and said are good to go, but I don't know for sure if .458 Socom or .50beo will fit into them. For some reason I remember .450 bushy being smaller case diameter (less of a shoulder) so the other two might not fit into the body... I'll have to check that and see!
 
Random thought... If I block Brian, will all the beowulf threads disappear? What about all those pesky ministry guys that hang out at the bottom of his driveway to check his mags every time he leaves the house?
 
25yu0rq.jpg

2u41v60.jpg
 
The 30rar only works out of the 450 mag because it is the same diameter case. I also had a custom bolt made that uses a regular barrel extension so it center feeds instead of from one side like it's original design in the R15 with hybrid AR 10 bolt

282go77.jpg

30rar mag for the R15
 
So you believe that when new evidence comes to light that an item due to its design origins actually contradicts cartridge control regulations, an frt entry can not legally be changed or edited? Lol
I bet if this was a mistake that went the other way, you would be perfectly fine with a change in classification rather than keeping the item prohibited
Click to expand...

Brian46;

Just for a minute; Try to imagine the precedent that would be set if a judge ruled that anything written in the FRT is defacto law.

The RCMP could simply arrest you for shooting your 50-Beowulf ACR Rifle outside of a range.

Five minutes before you walked into court; The RCMP could change the FRT to say that your ACR is a restricted AR-15 variant.

Now you go to jail.

Does this seem logical to you?
 
Dexter Morgan said:
Brian46;

Just for a minute; Try to imagine the precedent that would be set if a judge ruled that anything written in the FRT is defacto law.
Click to expand...
what precedence? If you were able to show even one case where a judge forced a change of a determination in the FRT you would be able to say one didn't already exist.

The RCMP could simply arrest you for shooting your 50-Beowulf ACR Rifle outside of a range.
Click to expand...
on what grounds currently?

Five minutes before you walked into court; The RCMP could change the FRT to say that your ACR is a restricted AR-15 variant.
Click to expand...
I would already need to be facing charges to be headed into criminal court, so what would those be?

Now you go to jail.

Does this seem logical to you?
Click to expand...
No, your post is anything but logical as I would need to break the law in the first place to be going to court.

As far as prohibiting guns overnight, that is exactly what has happened in the past. Only once did the government step in and reverse the new classification, every other time the rcmp came knocking and you had to turn the item in or get arrested
 
No, your post is anything but logical as I would need to break the law in the first place to be going to court.
Click to expand...

I thought I made it clear; They could arrest you for shooting a restricted firearm on Crown land. That's illegal.

Their evidence against you would simply be the FRT that they themselves typed up, whenever they felt like it.

So if the FRT says your that ACR rifle is an AR-15 variant; Would that mean it's true?

Or could someone challenge that in court?
 
Brian46 said:
my ACR is restricted?
Click to expand...


Ugh.

No... some pony boy sees you hunting with your ACR. He presses charges. You say “no, it’s an ACR. It’s non-restr...”

And he says “La la la I can’t hear you see you in court”. So you go to court to get the charge dropped, but by the time you get there, ponyboy has updated the FRT comment to say whatever he wants.

It’s opinion. Not law.
 
kodiakjack said:
Ugh.

No... some pony boy sees you hunting with your ACR. He presses charges. You say “no, it’s an ACR. It’s non-restr...”

And he says “La la la I can’t hear you see you in court”. So you go to court to get the charge dropped
Click to expand...

It would never make it into a courtroom seeing as the rifle is non restricted.

but by the time you get there, ponyboy has updated the FRT comment to say whatever he wants.
Click to expand...
you believe a constable at roadside that does not even know how to look up my rifle on his laptop at roadside to check the current status can convince the RCMP lab to change the frt just for me? Lol
 
kodiakjack said:
Ugh.

No... some pony boy sees you hunting with your ACR. He presses charges. You say “no, it’s an ACR. It’s non-restr...”

And he says “La la la I can’t hear you see you in court”. So you go to court to get the charge dropped, but by the time you get there, ponyboy has updated the FRT comment to say whatever he wants.

It’s opinion. Not law.
Click to expand...
You might as well be trying to rationalize with a house plant... Mr 46 just doesn't get it.
 
Brian46 said:
It would never make it into a courtroom seeing as the rifle is non restricted.

you believe a constable at roadside that does not even know how to look up my rifle on his laptop at roadside to check the current status can convince the RCMP lab to change the frt just for me? Lol
Click to expand...

It's a hypothetical situation Brian, based on something YOU said... Is your brain a rusted bolt?
 
Deuce-deuce said:
You might as well be trying to rationalize with a house plant... Mr 46 just doesn't get it.
Click to expand...

What is there to get, firearms have had their status changed overnight before and it was perfectly fine for them to do it. There was no Judge saying you can't do that. The RCMP came to your door to confiscate it, this happened with the spass 12, type 97, 10B police shotgun, etc.

Why does anyone posting now think that somehow this behavior is unlawful by police and they will be successful in a fight against it when nobody has in these numerous previous cases?
 
You might as well be trying to rationalize with a house plant... Mr 46 just doesn't get it.
Click to expand...

No. He gets it.

He's just refusing to answer my question; Because it shreds his notion that the FRT is above challenge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom