SC - you are correct. The point here is that people used the old design interlock on elk and moose all the time without the need of a premium bullet. And they continued to do so because they got decent performance. They trusted the interlock and hornady in general.
Now they no longer feel they can trust hornady because they made a change to their favorite non-premium without ever informing anyone about it. It certainly causes me to ponder the situation. If I can't trust that the same bullet is inside the same box today, tomorrow, a year or ten years down the road then what's a guy to do?
This is simple capitalism. The interlock was too good a bullet to have alongside the newly introduced interbond so they had to dumb it down so that they could make more money on premiums instead. If they had done this and told consumers, fine. But the silence is deafening.
Now they no longer feel they can trust hornady because they made a change to their favorite non-premium without ever informing anyone about it. It certainly causes me to ponder the situation. If I can't trust that the same bullet is inside the same box today, tomorrow, a year or ten years down the road then what's a guy to do?
This is simple capitalism. The interlock was too good a bullet to have alongside the newly introduced interbond so they had to dumb it down so that they could make more money on premiums instead. If they had done this and told consumers, fine. But the silence is deafening.



















































