Polar bears will be extinct within 25 years, scientist warns

John Y Cannuck

RichPoorMan<br>Super Moderator
Moderating Team
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Polar bears will be extinct within 25 years, scientist warns
73723-24606.jpg

Dennis Bueckert, Canadian Press
Published: Friday, April 21, 2006


OTTAWA -- Polar bears will be extinct within 25 years as global warming shrinks the ice cover they depend on for feeding and giving birth, says a renowned Australian scientist.

The Arctic ice cap is shrinking by eight per cent a year and polar bears are already showing signs of severe stress, says Tim Flannery, one of Australia's best-known scientists and author of the current best-seller The Weather Makers.

In the past, polar bears typically gave birth to triplets, but now they usually have just one cub, he said. And the weaning time has risen to 18 months from 12, while the average weight has declined 15 per cent.

"Polar bears are going to go with the ice cap. They're not going to actually last that long,'' Flannery told a news conference Friday.

Citing other warning signs, he said British Columbia's Fraser River has been fatally warm to salmon for five of the last 13 years, while West Coast forests are being decimated by an infestation of pine beetles able to survive milder winters.

"These are unheralded signs of change. They simply haven't been seen in the past. They persuade me and the vast majority of my colleagues that the debate on climate change is well and truly over. The science is solid and the effects are there for everyone to see.''

Flannery's visit to Ottawa came the day after former prime minister Brian Mulroney told an audience that included much of the country's political elite that Canada must recognize the urgency of global warming.

The current government has been sending mixed signals on the issue, saying it will stay in the Kyoto Protocol but promising a made-in-Canada solution that remains undefined.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said Canada can't meet its targets under the climate treaty. Yet Canada will preside over negotiations this year aimed at seeking even larger emissions reductions.

"It (Canada) chairs the negotiating process, and yet it is the only signatory of the Kyoto Protocol that's cutting its climate programs,'' said Flannery. "It looks as if it's going to abandon its commitments without ever having really tried to meet them.''

"As an Australian, I'm used to seeing better things from Canada. I think it would be an enormous tragedy if Canada cut and run from its international obligations.''

He said it is feasible to cut greenhouse emissions by applying the "polluter pays'' principle, cutting subsidies to the petroleum industry, and introducing a revenue-neutral carbon tax.

Under such a plan, the carbon tax would be offset by tax cuts in other areas. But the concept is anathema in Alberta, whose tar sands projects have become the country's biggest source of greenhouse emissions.

"It's only the tar sands that prevent the country from making its targets under Kyoto,'' said Flannery.
© Canadian Press 2006
 
This is a tragedy..so does this mean I can finally get a permit to hunt polar bear......I can then preserve one more specimen for future generations instead of only allowing the rich to preserve polar bear specimens at $25,000 US a pop.

Just kidding.......sort of.
 
What a crock of s**t! Bears as a group are the most adaptable critters next to coyotes. If polar bears can't get to the seals on the sea ice, they'll start hunting on land. In the summer, they ambush seals in the river, scavange whale carcasses on the coast, and take caribou. They will go where the food is, and in all probability will start to behave like grizzlies. Interestingly enough, grizzlies in the northern Yukon venture out onto the sea ice and kill seals. These scientists always make these great predictions...which result in more funding for for studies which result in more predictions....

I am curious how they think that the melting of multiyear ice will have an effect in any case. Seals can't make holes in multiyear ice, and therefore are only found around the fringes of the multiyear ice. High arctic polar bears are considerably smaller than the huge bears we get in Hudson Bay, and yet Hudson Bay is essentially ice free for 5 months.
 
Last edited:
Boomer has it right I think. They will adapt and change....they already are. Polar bears are being seen further inland than ever before and the barren ground grizzlies are being seen on artic islands way further north than ever before.
 
Basically, who cares?? It's nice, and all, to be concerned about various species, and humanity has a responsibility for proper stewardship of this planet BUT Darwinism marches on. There is a basic incompatibility between some species and mankind, so short of killing off some humans, those species are headed for the history books. There are also environmental changes, be they natural or man made, and species will adapt or perish for that reason, too.
I'm not a huge subscriber to the Global warming/Greenhouse gas/Human precipitator line of thinking, so I doubt that there's much we can do about the planetary temperature cycle, besides figure out how to adapt ourselves. And that might end up being more of a challenge than we anticipate!
 
The fraser river heats up when the water level drops in the summer with more water being pumped out for irrigation on the fields for crops.Its sagebrush and cactus there otherwise.
 
"As an Australian, I'm used to seeing better things from Canada. I think it would be an enormous tragedy if Canada cut and run from its international obligations.''

Fukc off. How about China? Bloody renowned scientists... :rolleyes:
 
Another foreign scientist who knows more about Canada than we do....he sees a cub sucking a teat at 18 months old and now they all do it?

The bear will just head more south......thats one thing this country aint lacking at all...snow and ice.

He should spend more time worrying about the Outback and what's going on there ..... but then he wouldn't get to fly here at the company's expense.

The earth takes care of itself just fine. Mr. fuggin' scientist should have been taught that in Grade 1. If the earth doesnt like something, it will let you know.

You guys notice Ive been cranky today? I think they're feeding me decaf at Tim's........I'll make my own coffee then, that'll show 'em......CSs
 
John Y Cannuck said:
The current government has been sending mixed signals on the issue, saying it will stay in the Kyoto Protocol but promising a made-in-Canada solution that remains undefined.
If you replay several interviews Cretien gave on the subject ... Canada never had any intention of living up to the Kyoto Protocol, but signed it just to be different than the Americans, different meaning DISHONEST.
 
I wish I can hunt one before that happens.....;)

For real now..... whre's the Dolly maker whe you need one?

Clone them, eh?

Mix them with something meaner.... and make them legal to hunt.....:eek:
 
Vic777 said:
How do you answer the birth going from 3 cubs to 1, do the math...

Cub mortality among polar bears is always very high, and when 3 cubs are born, the mother has never been able to provide for all - the least aggressive cub dies. Triple births are still quite frequent, and can been witnessed every year here - but there are some years where this is more common than others.

I would hasten to add that the polar bear population in the western Hudson Bay has been studied - by the CWS and others - more than any other population the world. The recent counts here still seem to indicate a population of 1200 animals, a number which has remained unchanged since I came here nearly 20 years ago.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom