Thanks for the replies. I will keep an eye for these original features. I figure $1400 to $1500 should get me a fine example.
1954, 55 & 56 are replacement receivers only with no "production" rifles manufactured.
Just look at the M1 Garands there is thousands of them in Canada but Prices are in the super hight range, I paid $95 for mine 40 years ago. Not to mention M39 Mosins Tradex was selling for $900 range, they were like $60 in the 70s. Back to the point WW2 ended 72 years ago unless we have time machine most surplus guns will be going up in price
I personally believe that $1500 should get the OP 1.5 very nice postwar rifles. The price Corwin has been charging is right at the top of the range for those rifles. The two that are posted on the EE, if absolutely PERFECT, should be ~1000-1200 each, no more. The price inflation we are seeing on Lee enfields lately is getting stupid, and the Corwin arms rifles are serving as justification for people to raise their prices into a range FAR above what these rifles are worth. I never understood why Longbranch rifles were priced higher in this country, there seems to be more of them than British manufactured rifles....
One guy selling both a 1949 and a 1950 on the EE right now.
Right in your price range. Too rich for me.
To Kman303,
What are you talking about too expensive. In Lloydminster at the show you would not go below $950 for the enfield on your table