Precision bolt action makes Coalition for Gun Control's list.

Weatherbys should be safe then..:nest: I wonder if that rifle was put in a wood stock it would have got so much attention ???
Another reason I am not into that word "Sniping or Sniper rifle" that some people use..the fascists/communists just love those words..aswell as registry..
But it's okay to fund junkees to go shoot up..and give them needles...but gun owners are the criminals..JFC...they might aswell get rid of liquor, knives, prositutes, and tobacco...and vehicles that go over 40km/hr..FFS..
Wow I just did some research on Peters,, she is bad news..
 
Last edited:
philthygeezer said:
President Rebecca Peters of IANSA stated that every rifle that shoots more than 100 meters should be banned. .
Click to expand...
This sounds somewhere between thoroughly crazy and British to me.

FWIW, Ms Peters is in the red blazer:
sirleaf-johnson.jpg


If she wants to look like a man, why can't she act like one?
 
actually it means every single gun even a good pellets gun can shoot past 100m.
We should stop hunting for a few years then stupid people like that one will peg for hunters to come back. The animal population would go up and more and more people maybe even her kids, if she has some, will get bitten by a coyote or maybe a bear.
Animal will start to die in big amount because of sickness and lack of food. Nature will have a very hard time balancing it self. Then what bring back the guns? Why please god tell me why so many morons in this country?
 
What we need is an alternate ###uality female hunting and shooting coalition to be formed in this country:

Butch Sassydaisy and the Sharpshoot Kittens.

What province would be best to initiate such a group? lol
 
noneck180 said:
Weatherbys should be safe then..:nest: I wonder if that rifle was put in a wood stock it would have got so much attention ???
Another reason I am not into that word "Sniping or Sniper rifle" that some people use..the fascists/communists just love those words..aswell as registry..
But it's okay to fund junkees to go shoot up..and give them needles...but gun owners are the criminals..JFC...they might aswell get rid of liquor, knives, prositutes, and tobacco...and vehicles that go over 40km/hr..FFS..
Wow I just did some research on Peters,, she is bad news..
Click to expand...

NO! NOT HOOKERS TOO!:eek:
 
CGC let the cat out of the bag big time!

1) Your super accurate paper punching target rifle is on the ban list.
2) Your politically incorrect looking scoped black rifle is on the ban list.
3) Your off the shelf Remington hunting rifle with scope is on the ban list.
4) Your 70 plus year old enfield with the cheap scope attatched to it with
hose clamps is also on the ban list.

If there ever was a loud wake up call for all gun owners to fight Wendy and her minions this is clearly it.
 
Screw'em all... I still got my bic pen and a wad of paper, also an assortment of paper clips and elastic bands... Come and get me you bunch of f'tards...

Seriously... these people need to be poked in the eye with a sharp stick!
 
Toomanyguns said:
They, in the above sentence refers to the persons going to get his guns. They will be empty (as in soul and mind) and thier barrels will be smoking.

Learn to read!
Click to expand...

Failing to comprehend that the empty, smoking barreled "they" refers to firearms certainly implies that *someone* needs more reading instruction.
 
LongBomber said:
No, he like the rest of us will be a true Canadian and give up our ability to do anything, and then cry about it later. I would say `rights` but we are based off of a monarchy, and as such have to have our rights granted. Don`t spin one guy into a crazy gunman.
Click to expand...

You are very likely right that the guy won't do much of anything but whine about the confiscation after the fact if it actually happened.

Sounding off like a nutjob and claiming that the persons (police in this country) who would be responsible for this, presently hypothetical, firearms confiscation will get them "smoking with empty barrels" will only increase support for more draconian gun laws among non gun owning citizens.

I have no problem with him bragging about some sort of fantasy "live free or die" stand to his buddies over a beer or seven. Spouting tripe like that in a public internet forum does all gun owners who want to remain gun owners a disservice.
 
scottm said:
You are very likely right that the guy won't do much of anything but whine about the confiscation after the fact if it actually happened.

Sounding off like a nutjob and claiming that the persons (police in this country) who would be responsible for this, presently hypothetical, firearms confiscation will get them "smoking with empty barrels" will only increase support for more draconian gun laws among non gun owning citizens.

I have no problem with him bragging about some sort of fantasy "live free or die" stand to his buddies over a beer or seven. Spouting tripe like that in a public internet forum does all gun owners who want to remain gun owners a disservice.
Click to expand...

I will most likely have an unfortunate fishing trip accident shortly before they come for my guns.
 
If we just stick together once and stop hunting for 3 year we will mess up the balance in the economy and the nature. They can live without hunters. They are maybe against hunting but it's only because they are ignorant. They wont realize until they hit 2 to 3 deers or moose a year with their nice suv.
 
The "Cold Dead Hands" scenario isn't going to play out folks. Quit fantasizing. The LEO's know you have lots guns so they'll pick you up at work or at the grocery store in a nice safe environment and raid your house when everything is quiet. They will not make a martyr out of you.

It's easy for politicians to vilify guns because they have lots of time on there hands it seems today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom