Went to the range this morning and have come to the conclusion that the bushnell scope has been hammered one to many times in the last 4 years. I used the remington scope supplied with the barrel and managed to tighten up the groups quite a bit. Tried the accutips and hornady SSt's and was able to get a 3 shot group just over 2 inches with the SSt's. So now, instead of using this scope I think I am going to get a better scope so I can hopefully steer clear of this same scenario down the road. I am looking at either the Prostaff 2 X 7 power or the Slughunter 3 X 9, both by Nikon. The slughunter is roughly $100 more then the Prostaff, other then the magnification and a couple other specs such as eye relief and F.O.V. is there any real difference between the two. I am leaning towards the Slughunter just for the fact that it has a longer eye relief which I like but for $100 if they are roughly the same I just might go with the Prostaff.