If adjustable grip sizes weren't a requirement the PX4 would not have been chosen for CBSA. At the time there wre very few options with this odd characteristic. The HK P30 came out in 2006 and iirc that was the year the CBSA pistol was chosen. I'm not sure why the P30 was not in the running, maybe it was not released at the time.
I like the looks of the PX4 and I believe that's why a lot of people are interested in it. The DAO trigger is horrible. Maybe the other DA/SA models have better triggers. Perhaps due to the price point CBSA paid Beretta cheaped out resulting in 5000 negative opinions.
The magazines are very cheap and don't like to be dropped on hard surfaces. Perhaps the civilian models have better mags.
If you can get one for $600 I'm sure you could shoot it for a year and get $500-$600 for it if you're not satisfied. That's not much to lose on a gun. I wouldn't pay $899+ tax& shipping new and then not like it and lose $400 on it. Good luck...
I was told that the criteria was written to make the M&P a shoe-in to move towards swapping 5946 for M&P for 17000 Mounties. Maybe it was an attempt to continue the long relationship with S&W or maybe the Glock rep didn't take the right people golfing lol.
It is strange that no federal officers carry Glocks when they make up roughly 50% of North American police sidearms. I'm not a Glock fan, had a 17 and 34, and didn't like the way they fit in my hand. However, you cannot deny their quality and reliability. The mags are the best.
Don't know how old you are, but me at 79, quite fit, very happy, married for 21 years to my lovely Wife, bitter, not me.
They only put that requirement in to block the Glock! The 5/6 lb trigger on the Glock was heaven compared to the PX4, the magazines made by Glock are the best magazines made. The G lic/LEO price on the Glock 19 down in Florida is, I think a fraction under $400.00 and no lingering problems, holster up, right out of the Box!
So why is the steel S&W better? By the way the S&W they were testing was not the 5946 but the M&P. Since one of the requirements was interchangeable grips. Were you there during the T&E process?
Good for you. I'm sure you're really happy.
My sarcasm was towards your general lack of knowledge and understanding of the roles and responsibilities of a BSO. Your lack of understanding of law enforcement firearms qualifications, standards and training.
Why? What's wrong with glocks? and to the person that suggested p30s. Lol canadian feds can't afford hks lol
.... Beretta is however pitching the PX4 as a posible replacement for the 92 so I expect significant changes without a complete overhaul of the pistol in the next few years. It might be prudent to save your money for the next generation of PX4s which should come in at the same price. When... your guess is as good as mine. Or if you can't wait that long, buy it. If you are an occasional shooter and like the (what I consider) ###y lines of the PX4 than you should be very happy with it. When the next gen comes out, I am there and I plan to sell the one I currently own. I am only expecting $400 to $500 for my current PX4 but will not sell it until I have its replacement in my hands. Hope this helps
If the feds can afford $35 billion planes, I think they can afford a HK pistol.
Besides, its not THEIR money, they are spending our money.
Wait, so they bought ####ty guns that are overpriced for what they are, and borderline unacceptable for a service pistol? Yupp, that sounds like the feds all right. If they got the HK it would have been expensive, but at least they would have gotten good guns for my money.
Pretty sure Federal Corrections have HK P2000Why? What's wrong with glocks? and to the person that suggested p30s. Lol canadian feds can't afford hks lol
Pretty sure Federal Corrections have HK P2000
BooSSted said:They aren't over priced when buying 5000 of them. I think they paid about $300 per unit.
Pretty sure Federal Corrections have HK P2000
Yes... because ALL BSOs work in tiny booths... Last time I looked around the line there were plenty of older RCMP members who pass without issues. There are also plenty of older BSOs that have passed without issues. I don't know what your point is. Sounds like you're rather bitter about something. Wonder what they could be?
Distances can vary considerably. Most law enforcement shootings are very close range but, I've got lots of wide open space I can see currently and really I'd rather have the distance between them and me if at all possible (I may not be so lucky however). Also armed officers work in a variety of different modes and operations (and not all armed officers are BSOs) not just highway crossings. Also remember CBSA officers have no other firearm other than a sidearm so just as well qualifications happen at 25m as there's no other firearm to turn to if the distance grows.
All the federal agencies who carry sidearms follow the RCMP model. Not all police forces qualify at 25m (most practice at 25m however) but, then again they also have other firearms for longer distances. Most officers are now passing, even with the 25m especially with changes to the program which mean more range time and coaching if you fail your course.
On topic, I'd likely not buy a PX4 for myself, I mean it's ok but, nothing I'd spend my own money on. I have colt commander sized handguns and a Boberg Arms as I carry when in Alaska (and a 454 for the Alaskan bush). Save your money, I hate the sticky out barrel of the restricted model too. If I was going to buy a PX4 might spring for the .45acp SD but, it's a slightly different animal than the 9mm and pricey.