I confess that what has eluded me throughout this entire discussion is whether there is any utility in knowing the answer to the initial premise. Certainly, practically, for me there is none.
But it provides much food for thought for considering ones testing methods. I believe a true but non-intuitive fact is that five 2 shot groups provide sounder statistical standing than one 10 shot group. Certainly the small10 shot group is a widely pursued and desirable goal among many but it provides very poor value statistically ... bang for your buck you might say.
But it provides much food for thought for considering ones testing methods. I believe a true but non-intuitive fact is that five 2 shot groups provide sounder statistical standing than one 10 shot group. Certainly the small10 shot group is a widely pursued and desirable goal among many but it provides very poor value statistically ... bang for your buck you might say.
