Range Report: CZ-85 Combat 9mm

Unregistered

Regular
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Location
South Ontario
My CZ-85 Combat in 9mm arrived last week and I took it out shooting on the weekend. Here is my review:

Shipping:

My CZ-85 Combat arrived in a nice little plastic blue carrying case together with a bore jag and a brush cleaning rod. Two factory 10-round magazines came in the case, and what appeared to be a magazine loading tool, and two dummy 9mm rounds were included inside the magazine base. I could not find a test target. The very clear and illustrated instruction manual explained basic procedures.

First impressions:

The CZ-85 is fairly large for a 9mm handgun. It is definitely a "full-sized" handgun. The grips are plastic, but designed with integral thumb rests for enhanced grip. I think the chequering on the grip is unnecessary, though it does help your hand remain in the same place. I have ordered smooth wood grips to test them out.

My CZ-85 came with satin nickel finish, which provides uniform protection and looks as if it will stand up to the elements.

Chambering a round with the slide is a bit more difficult than with a 1911 or SIG 228, for example, because there is only half the serrated slide surface to grasp, since much of the slide or rails ride the frame internally for better accuracy. It is also very tight from the factory.

Ergnomics, or placement of controls, resembles a 1911. However, I found that the slide release was just out of reach, and less convenient than on the 1911. The safety was also "sticky," which may be even worse on the ambidextrous CZ-85 design because you have to be able to manipulate the safety on both sides of the pistol at once.

Magazine release is very positive, and magazines seat very well and easily into the grip. However, I found that the extended magazine release extends too far - my finger often contacted it after pulling the trigger.

The trigger pull leaves a bit to be desired. Double action is about what you would expect, it is like a double action revolver, just a little heavier than my S&W Model 28. There is a lot of take-up in both SA and DA. Single-action does not break as cleanly as I would like. There is a bit of a "gummy" feeling when I pull the trigger.

I noticed the trigger smooth up with cleaning, and then use. After 100 rounds, it was a little better. Hopefully it will continue to improve. Out of the box, the single-action trigger pull is nicer than a stock Norinco 1911, but not as nice as a Norinco P228 copy. The DA trigger pull REALLY smooths out after shooting, however, and is far better than the Norinco P228 DA trigger.

Sights are standard 3-dot setup. They are very low, which would be good for carry, but at 25 yards, you have to squint a little to get you sight picture. They strongly resemble the sights that come on a Norinco 1911 or NP-34, but are cut and finished a little nicer, and coloured in more carefully. They also glow in the dark, which is neat.

Pointability of this firearm is very nice, and would be aided by sights that can be acquired more quickly.

I stripped the pistol for pre-fire inspection and let me say that the field strip is very easy and only requires one tool: a pen or magazine base to punch the slide release for disassembly. Stripping was much easier than I thought it would be, and is closer to the Sig 228 than the 1911. Cleaning it is a dream.

Firing at the Range:

I fired from the 25 yard range to start with. The first thing I noticed when firing was the recoil. The size and bulk of the CZ-85 should have reduced the recoil considerably. What I found was that muzzle flip was considerable, greater than a SIG 228 and almost as much as a 1911 in my hands.

The recoil impulse was gentle, and by no means did it hurt, but the muzzle flip made it slower to get back on target than my Norinco NP-34. I suspect that if I improved my handgrip, muzzle flip would be reduced.

It was actually very pleasant to fire, despite the higher-than-anticipated muzzle flip. Some of the ergonomic issues I had worried about were not as severe as I had thought. In single-action fire, my finger impacted the extended slide release much less. I am still considering removing the extended slide release, but currently the magazine release is so easy and positive that it is a difficult decision.

Accuracy was very good. The following images show the 25-yard groups I shot in my first time shooting a CZ. They were the best groups I had ever acheived with a semi-automatic centrefire pistol. The groups below do not necessarily indicate the mechanical accuracy potential of the pistol, but my ability to shoot it better than others. At 10-12 yards, the pistol bullseyed easily and consistently every time.





Reliability was 100%. I fired 100 rounds without any feeding or extraction problems.

The only negative I discovered while firing at this time was that the edges of the trigger sometimes bit my finger. Maybe I should smooth or round them a bit more.

In conclusion, the pistol so far has been accurate, reliable, and easy to clean. Out of the box it appears to require no work whatsoever. To improve the pistol, I might switch to a regular magazine release, add high-visibility high-profile front and rear sights, get a trigger job, and maybe an extended magazine release. And nicer grips. This pistol is the way that Norincos should be out of the box - rugged, reliable, and not needing any modifications, but accepting of any should they be necessary. It is a cheap date at $12.95 a box of 9mm, and shooting it accurately, will accompany me on future range trips. So the next question is, where is a good place to buy magazines for it?
 
Last edited:
Good report. You will find the CZ to be dead nuts reliable. I have one made in 1988 with a zillion rounds through it. Gun is as tight as the day it was made. Overall an excellent shooter. Sound sto me most of your issues will resolve themselves over time as you get used to the grip and the gun. I would wait if I were you and shoot it some more before spending money on the gun. You may find some of the issues disappear with use.

Take Care

Bob
 
As an owner of an 85 combat, I have a couple of questions/points.

You say the safety is sticky because it needs to be manipulated from both sides at once? I'm guessing it is just tight due to being new.


Your trigger is the adjustable one, no? you can adjust your overtravel.
Go to ghostholster.com for a reduced 15lb mainspring and new hammer-it will do wonders to the DA & SA pulls.

If you are focusing on the front sight, why do you have to squint while shooting at 25m?:confused:

I also don't understand how you figure the Sigs have a lower bore axis?

The CZs are comperable in size to most other 4.5" barreled 9mm autos, with the exception of the slide. The slide is fairly light in comparison, and maybe the reason you are seeing more perceved muzzle flip.
 
Thanks, the light slide would explain the perceived muzzle flip. I am used to much heavier slides on all of my automatics, and even my pistol calibre carbine has a really heavy bolt.

Yes, I should have included it, but the safety is becoming less sticky with use. It is still more sticky than a 1911, even out of the box, but it is becoming less sticky. I figured that maybe the fact that the safety is present on both sides may have magnified the tightness. It will likely become less and less of an issue over time.

Yes, the trigger does have overtravel adjustment, and I am grateful for it. I will eventually get around to doing something about the trigger. Thanks for the spring recommendations, I may get one of those.

As for the sights, I just find that larger, more high-profile sights, especially fiber optics, are much easier to make out. At 25 yards, I find I am focusing on a relatively distant target while trying to keep the small sights in line, which I find more difficult than when I am using big bright sights. It's just me. There's nothing actually wrong with the sights. They came zeroed out of the box and work well.

And yes, I was probably wrong about the lower bore axis. I must have been thinking about another pistol.
 
Heavy pistol with light slide should not bounce much. Its your recoil spring being much too heavy. 1911's go with 14-16lb as stock for 45. CZ goes with 18-20lb for 9mm - too heavy. Run a 14 in a 75/85 with factory stuff and you will be suprised how little the pistol jumps.

Belt is correct on the 15lb main and CZ hammer - you will laugh how nice the trigger gets with drop in parts.
 
Did you check under the foam in the lid for the test target?
That's where mine was hidden on my 75B

I haven't found anywhere with mags cheaper than $45
and Gunsnthings charges that but with taxes already in.

I put some Skateboard grip tape on the front strap of my Tutone, it helps grip when drawing from holster. Got a weird look when the kid asked for my board as they will put it on for free and I told him what it's really for.
 
Mine is accurate too, and has never ever jammed once. My friends Kimbers and high powers have all jammed before this one.

Good looks too, I would as far to say that it would be a better choice and more accurate than a Berreta.
 
One thing I like about the new Armalite pistols (CZ-clones) is that the back end of the slide is raised up to increase the gripping surface. My NZ-85 is tough to rack and I plan on replacing the springs soon.
 
Back
Top Bottom