Range Report XCR and Tavor

Wow...after all of ArmedSask's whining about the XCR, looks like the tavor (although still very cool) is not worth the hype either. Sights worth dumping, mount problems and highly inaccurate. My XCR is a straight shooter out of the box, has great flip up iron sights that just happens to co-witness with my Aimpoint Comp M3 with ARMS 62 mount. Dang I looooove the XCR.

I have no desire to knock the XCR cause if I had the money I would have bought it as well. But the grouping sounds terrible. If bench shooting with bags or a led sled, the sights should be causing that big a group. Sounds like they are just innacurate. Anyone got a bore scope to check theirs out?

Ya I think he meant the Tavor. The XCR is a fine rifle I shot 300 rounds through it without malifunction and it had excellent accuracy considering It wasn't benched when fired.
 
I'm going to take sand bags with me this weekend and some larger targets(without a orange center).Also see who is around to go with me that has more experience.
 
LOL,I just figured out why my groups were so bad with Tavor at 100.I don't have a left hand bolt yet and have to use my other shoulder??Makes sense to me.Can't wait to get out again with sand bags
 
My Tavor experience is limited to the demo rifle.
I would suggest that the Mepro sight is neither intended nor appropriate for any sort of precision testing of a rifle's accuracy potential.
A suitable aiming mark would certainly be a great help, but will still not make the sight into a precision one.
I know that if I want to determine exactly how accurate any rifle is, I need to fit an appropriate sight.
The mandatory inclusion of the Mepro sight with the Tavor has been flogged to death. Personally, I feel it makes the rifle a harder sell. I would rather pay the same, and receive a rifle with a universal rail, rather than this sight on its unique mount.
As far as a steady shooting position is concerned, I found that the best approach was to shoot prone, with a 5/30 magazine right on the mat. Left hand is between the ground and the grip, and is used to control natural elevation adjustment. It was my impression that the rifle was inherently accurate, very easy to shoot.
 
My groups were better than that at 50 yards but not by much with the tavor. I am definitely getting that picatinny rail. I am sure properly benched and with a decent sight on the gun it will provide good groups. I am thinking the meprolight is better suited to be a shotgun sight.


The Mepro is just fine as a CQB sight, but (obviously) has its limitations as a 'precision optic'. I intend to use mine for action shooting, and as all our targets are 100 yards or less, I expect no issues with it. BTW, you'd be surprised to find out how many people have difficulty hitting a target at 100 yards when placed under competitive stress no matter which rifle/optics they use.

I will likely try out some magnified optics on other rifles, but I have some concerns about loss of speed when using those systems. The Tavor/Mepro combination is particularly well suited to the fast, close in shooting game, which shouldn't be a big surprise to anyone who has read about the rationale for its development.
 
I wanted a Tavor. Is there anyway to get one without the reflex sight? Gimme a long pic rail to put some better optics on it and I will buy one, for now, my XCR is the go to gopher slayer.
 
quite possibly. I routinely deliver far better groups with iron sights than with generic red dot on my Beretta Storm.
 
Back
Top Bottom