And don't forget three posts and one trader rating
My bone to pick is this Pre 64 Winchester anything. Many guns built in the 62,63,64 were built with such poor tolerances due to wore out machinery that they are not real collectibles.
My bone to pick is this Pre 64 Winchester anything. Many guns built in the 62,63,64 were built with such poor tolerances due to wore out machinery that they are not real collectibles.
Yew-neek, it's the term I like to yewse
I bet you'd have paid a rare price to get your mitts on them Cleo's Doug showed you how to use?!![]()
That one IS rare. Model 7s and BARs, etc are NOT.
Doug
LOL, I bought that model 7 , not rare, just not many up for sale , 700's are all over all the time.
I can go 5 or 6 months and not see a 7 for sale
My bone to pick is this Pre 64 Winchester anything. Many guns built in the 62,63,64 were built with such poor tolerances due to wore out machinery that they are not real collectibles.
Same for condition; where there are already set definitions used by firearms organizations.
I too recommend a definition be determined and listed for "rare", and if a post doesn't meet the definition, the Moderator either pulls it or edits it.
Same for condition; where there are already set definitions used by firearms organizations....
... I guess buyers should be armed with good information.
It's also rare to get a reasonable accurate discription of the condition. Many ads have dinged and scratched stocks, bluing worn or some rust and say that it is in excellent condition - NOT
They is also the fallacy that the older a firearms is the above standards should be on a sliding scale, crap bores, 0 bluing, split stocks etc.... are perfectly acceptable and deserve an excellent rating