To a first approximation, all that matters is bullet length and barrel twist - to a first approximation, velocity does not matter.
It is only to a second order approximation, that bullet velocity starts to matter (more specifically, that the bullet's drag coefficient slowly decreases with increasing velocity). Note that bullet RPM is not directly involved in determining stability, it's a twist-versus-drag relationship.
I have that sort of thing from the TR crowd before as well. I can never bring myself to trust buying a barrel for it though. So, if a long twist is better for a ~150 gr, and 175s work in a 14 twist, why do so many militaries use 10-11.25 twist?
Why is it then that barrels actually chosen, and recommendations made by bullet and barrel makers are so conservative, compared to twist/bullet combinations that actually work?
It's because if you don't have a quick enough twist, the bullets won't stabilize, and this has absolutely *catastrophic* effects on accuracy. It doesn't open up groups a little bit - it produces 10 foot sized groups at 100.
On the other hand, having a twist rate quicker than necessary will typically have somewhere between little to no effect on accuracy.
JBM has a
version of their calculator that includes the Miller stability formula. Give it a try, be sure to correctly enter your bullet's weight, length and caliber.
There's no way a 208 Amax will stabilize in a 14-twist barrel, it's just too long. If you could get them to stabilize (e.g. in a 12 or quicker), you will likely be able to get a bit of a performance (wind drift) edge over 155s. You will have to tolerate more recoil, you'll be throwing about 35% more bullet mass, at (say) 10-15% less velocity, so Mr. Newton says you're going to get thumped 20-25% harder. Not a make or break proposition, but definitely a step in the wrong direction!