re-inventing the wheel 788 6.5CM build

Your stock design is brilliant, reminiscent of the Steyr and those old discontinued aftermarket stocks with the bipod hidden in the forend. The buttstock reminds me of the Sentinel chassis.

Would love to have something like this available for purchase. Super practical. You should patent and build these!

Thanks, basically the forestock is a bit long. I figure anytime where a small bipod would be used a pack or rolled up jacket would suffice in place and actually be used more often so that makes the stock longer for more of a medium length bipod and the form of the rifle is a bit off balance for function.

I've a 788 question. You have one so it seems logical enough to ask.
Do you suppose the rear lugs will allow the bolt to compress enough to shorten case life? Or would that be specific to a particular cartridge type like rimmed and tapered one?
If you reload mind you.
Cheers Tok

Hey, so I haven't shot enough or even started reloading to know enough about stretching brass. There's so many posts on forums about this that I'm definitely not the qualified resource, but my understanding is that some people report it as a significant factor, others not really or much at all. I think if you shoot and reload a lot it's probably more important. This is more of a hunting rig and I doubt ill put more than 40-60 rounds through it a year, probably more like half that. I have about 80-100 rounds of once fired brass to work with, even with stretching they will probably last 4-5 years before reloaded a third time. If case life is an issue Ill reload less times before recycling brass.

The shorter OAL achieved with lugs at the back, as well as reshaping the trigger for another 30mm shorter OAL and the fast bolt lock time are perceived benefits that are bigger than the concern of stretched brass for me. Trying to work on something that feels like something new, or gain skills are more important to me than for most people as well.
 
I've a 788 question. You have one so it seems logical enough to ask.
Do you suppose the rear lugs will allow the bolt to compress enough to shorten case life? Or would that be specific to a particular cartridge type like rimmed and tapered one?
If you reload mind you.
Cheers Tok

I've owned numerous 788's. Brass stretch from the rear lug receiver was never an issue with any of them. - dan
 
Nice build project cody c. :cool:
The wee beasty should shoot well for you once you get 'er sorted out & dialed in with loads that it likes. No worries on brass life at SAAMI spec pressures.
It takes a real hot (Idiot) load to get setback of the locking lugs or bolt compression on the 788 action. The warm loads in my 788's would make for loose
primer pockets after 5 reloadings. I also would trim the case mouths after 2 reloadings, but that was neck stretch which be normal with cartridges in the
pressure ranges these rifles were built for.
 
Shell shucker, good to know. I’ve read a few posts about getting great velocities with RL-17 I believe. Would like to go with 143-147 weight bullets, heavier end seems to retain energy out further. If I could get close to 2850 with 147’s I’d be super stoked.

I chrono’d federal 130’s and 140’s and had them both in mid 2700’s. One showed at 2936!!! But I assume that was a glitch on the chrono. Pretty inconsistent velocities though.
 
Back
Top Bottom