Ardent said:Still a locked bolt, roller locked, just a different system of accomplishing it.![]()

Beater said:well, what is the difference between the G3 and the MG 42?..ive never had a HK to take apart, but ive been inside a 42. sounds to me like they work the same. rollers camed out to lock the bolt.
Ardent said:You got it same principleRollers are forced outward holding the bolt in place while the pressure is peaking, as it comes down the rollers fall in and the bolt cycles.
Cocked you raise good points, though I personally still see the roller locking as a lock, it just doesn't use gas piston operation. It is certainly locked against the peak pressure and holds back a good deal of force until the pressure decreases. I think this is a matter of interpretation though, as this is just my take, your's is reasonable too.

USP said:I thought HK went with this design on the G3 cause they had old WW2 equipment that was already setup to work with this sort of design.
Close, the German government paid for the CETME license after FN refused to license Germany to build the FAL.After the license was bought then HK was set up to build the rifles for the government. At first Rhienmettal also was set up but they moved their interest to other areas after their obligation was up. The part about the engineers is right but they went to work in France first, then Spain.CanAm said:Engineers from Mauser designed the Stgw45 and after the war went to work at CETME in Spain, then formed HK, using basically the CETME design. In fact some parts are the same.
Actually, you are not correct.Cocked&Locked said:the roller lock is really not a mechanical lock like the tilting breech block of say an fn or ak, its just a way of slowing down the opening slightly with mechanical dis-advantage, it's never really locked. If you shut of the gas with a locked action you have a single shot, with a G3 this can't be done.
Correct me if I'm wrong, it's not like I know everything, I just sometimes think I do![]()
nairbg said:Actually, you are not correct.
When the bolt is in battery, the rollers are forced outward into their locking notches in the breech, by a spring loaded, solid, tapered "pin" that sits between the rollers inside the front 1/2 of the bolt. This is where the term "roller-locked" comes from.
The bolt is a 2-piece affair. The rear 1/2 of the bolt is anchored to the aforementioned "pin", and the 2 halves are held together with an internal spring.
Upon firing, the "blowback" force is conducted through the front 1/2 of the bolt (that is locked in place), to the rear bolt-half, exactly as energy is transfered when the first of 2 billiard balls, sitting in contact, is struck by the cue ball. This causes the rear 1/2 of the bolt to travel rearward, pulling the tapered "pin" backward, from between the rollers in the front bolt-half. This unlocks the rollers, and allows the rollers to move inward in the bolt, unlocking the bolt from the breech notches. The front bolt-half, being attached to the rear half is then pulled backward from the breech initiating ejection and the rest of the reloading cycle.
The time it takes for the force to be transmitted through the bolt and to move the rear bolt-half against the internal spring rearward enough to unlock the front bolt-half rollers is about the time it takes for the bullet to exit the barrel. Hence "delayed, r/l, blowback" This is why the system is so inherently accurate. This system fires from a breech that is every bit as locked as a bolt-action receiver, and essentially no mechanical activity begins before the bullet has left the barrel.
Excellent comparison and explanation of the difference between the HK ROLLER-LOCKED delayed blow-back, and simple dlealyed blow-back. You are correct...... the rollers actually lock the breech as solid as any bolt -action rifle does. The blowback provides the energy to the 2-piece bolt to first unlock the bolt, and THEN to cycle it. A definite 2-step process, unlike straight "blow-back" or "delayed blow-back".bluestratus said:hey guys interesting thread perhaps i may chime in, here we go.
this is why i beleive its lock breach.
direct force applied to the bolt face will not unlock a g3, if you were to insert a wooden or steel rod (not advisable) down the bore from the muzzle and apply force the bolt would not unlock no matter how much force you applied, it would simply damage the bolt before it unlocked this is the same with ar or fn. so in saying this take the browning hi power pistol which is delayed blowback.i understand its a handgun but its delayed blowback as has been suggested about the g3 in this thread so bear with me.if you were to insert same said rod down the bore and apply pressure at some point it will unlock by direct pressure on the bolt face, hence delayed but not locked.
this is my argument for roller locked not delayed.thanks for listening
almost. If the presure gets high enough it will be stationary.Cocked&Locked said:at no point in the fireing cycle is the bolt of the G3 staionary. The ball/cam arangement slows the motion, but never stops it.
There is no camming action on the rollers. It is a resistance to motion. Camming has a different meaning than what the rollers are doing in this operation.Cocked&Locked said:resistance from the camming action drops and it opens.
I would agree. except that the delay had to be built in for the HK mechanism and is not incidental.Cocked&Locked said:The delayed blowback action is not a locked action, it is a blowback one, the fact that the blowback is retarded is incidental. The standard handgun action is a short recoil locked action with centerfire cartridges with very few exceptions for low powered rounds (.25, .32) The astra's where an anomoly that has not been repeated more than once (and you better be in shape to pull that slide back)




























