Beauvais98
CGN Regular
- Location
- Greater Ottawa Area
I took my first purpose-built 22LR pistol to the range for the first time yesterday. It's a Ruger Mark IV Standard with the 4.75" barrel.
I'm really smitten by the Mark IV Standard. It boasts a classic, vintage appearance but conceals state of the art internal workings.
I have to come clean and admit that when I was first shopping for my first 22LR pistol, I was not giving the Mark IV series any consideration. At all. I did not like how the Rugers looked, period. I was mainly attracted by 22 pistols that looked like centre fire pistols and I really snubbed any purpose-built 22's like the Ruger Mark IV or the Browning Buckmarks. This is what brought me to buy a Sig Sauer P226 22LR as my first 22. It looked exactly like its 9mm brother and that was what sold me on the Sig. Never in a million years did I ever think of looking at the Mark IV seriously.
Several thousands of rounds later, I opened my mind a little wider and came to wonder why people raved so much about the Rugers, and this is when I decided to hold one in my hand, just to get a feeling. What really got my attention was how solidly built this gun appears to be, in spite of its relatively low weight.
A gentlemen at my range was kind enough to let me try his Mark III 22/45 Target. I immediately fell for this pistol! I achieved better results with the Ruger than with my P226, with which I had lots of range time. A week later, I was ordering my very own Standard. I had some initial reservations about the grip angle, the Mark IV having a more pronounced grip angle than the 22/45. In the end I decided to take a leap of faith and I must admit that the Mk IV's grip angle felt very natural in my hand.
Anyway, I had so much fun shooting with it yesterday that I think I may give my Sig and even my Smith & Wesson M&P9 2.0 a well deserved break for the foreseeable future.
I'm really smitten by the Mark IV Standard. It boasts a classic, vintage appearance but conceals state of the art internal workings.
I have to come clean and admit that when I was first shopping for my first 22LR pistol, I was not giving the Mark IV series any consideration. At all. I did not like how the Rugers looked, period. I was mainly attracted by 22 pistols that looked like centre fire pistols and I really snubbed any purpose-built 22's like the Ruger Mark IV or the Browning Buckmarks. This is what brought me to buy a Sig Sauer P226 22LR as my first 22. It looked exactly like its 9mm brother and that was what sold me on the Sig. Never in a million years did I ever think of looking at the Mark IV seriously.
Several thousands of rounds later, I opened my mind a little wider and came to wonder why people raved so much about the Rugers, and this is when I decided to hold one in my hand, just to get a feeling. What really got my attention was how solidly built this gun appears to be, in spite of its relatively low weight.
A gentlemen at my range was kind enough to let me try his Mark III 22/45 Target. I immediately fell for this pistol! I achieved better results with the Ruger than with my P226, with which I had lots of range time. A week later, I was ordering my very own Standard. I had some initial reservations about the grip angle, the Mark IV having a more pronounced grip angle than the 22/45. In the end I decided to take a leap of faith and I must admit that the Mk IV's grip angle felt very natural in my hand.
Anyway, I had so much fun shooting with it yesterday that I think I may give my Sig and even my Smith & Wesson M&P9 2.0 a well deserved break for the foreseeable future.
Last edited:



















































