rem 700 problems

mylesrom said:
Thats funny, my 700 SPS in 270 WSM, feeds like a dream... and how about that high quality plastic stock on the T3s and the quality recoil pad, yep, superior. Where can you find a replacement stock for it???? Lets see, no one makes them.... Great barrels and actions, too bad they couldn't put a quality stock on it.

The T-3 light was designed as a light and inexpensive quality rifle... hence the co-polymer/glass fibre stock (not plastic!). Which by the way is a superior design by Giugiaro, they are amazingly recoil friendly for a light rifle in the magnum calibers.
If you want you can get a factory laminate or walnut stocked T-3 as well... they are far better fit and finish than you see on the average Remingtons. The only thing you got right in your post was that the T-3 have great barrels and actions... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
BIGREDD said:
The T-3 light was designed as a light and inexpensive quality rifle... hence the co-polymer/glass fibre stock (not plastic!). Which by the way is a superior design by Giugiaro, they are amazingly recoil friendly for a light rifle in the magnum calibers.
If you want you can get a factory laminate or a beautiful wood stock for the T-3 as well... they are far better fit and finish than you see on the average Remingtons. The only thing you got right in your post was that the T-3 have great barrels and actions... :rolleyes:

I have fired the 300 WSM in the Tikka T3, it is anything but recoil friendly. I was being sarcastic about it being plastic. Yes, I agree the laminated one is much nicer but its also a grand, which no longer makes it an inexpensive rifle. But the new Deluxe version also looks good, which is my pick. I was going to buy a T3 lite, but I still can't warm up to the feel of the stock.
But you would think for 1000 bucks for the laminate or the deluxe they could put a better recoil pad on it. Though that is easily rectified.
 
Last edited:
I'd check the tension on the mag lips as well as for any burrs on the underside. As this part is usually stamped, it could have some sharp or rough edges on it.
 
mylesrom said:
Thats funny, my 700 SPS in 270 WSM, feeds like a dream... and how about that high quality plastic stock on the T3s and the quality recoil pad, yep, superior. Where can you find a replacement stock for it???? Lets see, no one makes them.... Great barrels and actions, too bad they couldn't put a quality stock on it.

The quality of these rifles (Wins & Rems) is so magnificent that even the Japanese want to make them now... (actually, maybe they will be even better). But why does availability of after market parts make a rifle superior? (Just like a Chevs - let's not get into that string!) Besides, if the Rems & Wins stocks are so versatile, why would you want to replace them? Are we talking in circles here? As for Tikka, it is nothing that a recoil pad installed by a gunsmith can't fix, just like all the work I needed done on my Wins & Rems!:p
 
Ltbull01 said:
The quality of these rifles (Wins & Rems) is so magnificent that even the Japanese want to make them now... (actually, maybe they will be even better). But why does availability of after market parts make a rifle superior? (Just like a Chevs - let's not get into that string!) Besides, if the Rems & Wins stocks are so versatile, why would you want to replace them? Are we talking in circles here? As for Tikka, it is nothing that a recoil pad installed by a gunsmith can't fix, just like all the work I needed done on my Wins & Rems!:p

You stated Tikka's were superior in your earlier post. Quote"But the Finns know all about building superior firearm products - not like Winchester and Rem!"

I responded that they Tikka's are not without there faults also. I never stated Remingtons or Winchesters were superior, I mentioned you have options of stocks, aftermarket parts, etc. I like Tikka's, except for their T3 Lite stock. My point was Tikka IMHO was not necessarily a superior rifle as you stated. If you like the stock, then buy it and you will be happy but if you are unhappy with it for whatever reason, (eg. you would like to have a wood stock) you can't change it. But yes, as I stated above earlier Tikka's are excellent rifles.
 
Last edited:
mylesrom said:
You stated Tikka's were superior in your earlier post. Quote"But the Finns know all about building superior firearm products - not like Winchester and Rem!"

I responded that they Tikka's are not without there faults also. I never stated Remingtons or Winchesters were superior, I mentioned you have options of stocks, aftermarket parts, etc. I like Tikka's, except for their T3 Lite stock. My point was Tikka IMHO was not necessarily a superior rifle as you stated. If you like the stock, then buy it and you will be happy but if you are unhappy with it for whatever reason, (eg. you would like to have a wood stock) you can't change it. But yes, as I stated above earlier Tikka's are excellent rifles.
I'm saying it. Tikka is superior. I concede stocks are a matter of personal preference. Some like monte carlo, wood, straight comb, small grip, etc. The Tikka stock comes floated, as good a polymer stock as any other and the accuracy is top notch. All my Rems & Wins have needed work out of the box to get them to shoot the way I want them too (sub-MOA). That includes floating, bedding, post bedding on one instance and a bit of customn trigger work, including recoil pad. Did not have to do that with a Tikka T3 (except I will get a recoil pad installed). There is a reason Rem & Win are on the skids, I believe. And the Finns make superior firearms, darn it all! I am biased though - something about my dad being Finnish....;)
 
Ltbull01 said:
I'm saying it. Tikka is superior. I concede stocks are a matter of personal preference. Some like monte carlo, wood, straight comb, small grip, etc. The Tikka stock comes floated, as good a polymer stock as any other and the accuracy is top notch. All my Rems & Wins have needed work out of the box to get them to shoot the way I want them too (sub-MOA). That includes floating, bedding, post bedding on one instance and a bit of customn trigger work, including recoil pad. Did not have to do that with a Tikka T3 (except I will get a recoil pad installed). There is a reason Rem & Win are on the skids, I believe. And the Finns make superior firearms, darn it all! I am biased though - something about my dad being Finnish....;)

Well they all can't be "perfect" like your Tikka.

Since your Remington and Winchesters are all crap, I will give you 50 bucks for the lot.. Also since you have the inside scoop, let me know when Remington is closing its doors, so I can get spare parts...
 
Last edited:
mylesrom said:
Well they all can't be "perfect" like your Tikka.

Since your Remington and Winchesters are all crap, I will give you 50 bucks for the lot.. Also since you have the inside scoop, let me know when Remington is closing its doors, so I can get spare parts...

You know what is coming next... I traded my Rems & Wins for - you guessed it - my Tikka T3 Lite.

Rem is 'reportedly' closing doors to shift production to Japan as Win has already done.
 
mjcurry said:
i just bought a remington 700 sps in 300 wsm and i love it except when you put a bullet in the magazine the first one goes in good but the second one jams in their and if you trying and cycle it it scratches the brass really bad. any suggestions or anyone else have this problem??

I'm running into a simular problem with my 700 also.
 
boonerbuck said:
I'm running into a simular problem with my 700 also.

Boonerbuck, I pulled this off another site

"Your problem may be that the mag body is not fitting into the recess on the floorplate/trigger guard assembly. There is a step cut out that the mag body must fit into so that the mag body is straight and aligned with the receiver cutout. This would cause the pinching and mis-alignment of the rear slit on the mag body. We have had similar experiences at SOTIC and it is almost always caused when the student fails to check the recess during re-assembly. This is a step we drill into the students for re-assembly check. Open the floorplate and feel inside the mag body. Does the mag body fit inside the floorplate assembly recess? If not, loosen the receiver screws and re-align the body with the recess. If this is difficult to accomplish, then remove the stock and check to see if the mag body fits inside the recess when the stock is off the weapon. It may have been torqued out of shape due to it not fitting before, and being squeezed under pressure of the receiver screws. Anytime that the weapon's mag body is not aligned with the recess and fitted into it, the results are exactly as you described your problems. In .308 it is the fourth round that is difficult to load and the fifth is impossible. The third round jams in an angled down position. Hope this helps. "



Boonerbuck, Pull your stock off and you will see see there is a cutout for the mag body that needs to line up with your barrel on the front . Place the mag body back into the barrel lining it up flush, the back of the mag body has a split, that has to be compressed when placing it back in the barrel assembly. Then reassemble the barrel and mag body as one unit into the stock and put the floorplate on . If the mag body is not flush with the barrel assembly, eg. the front it too high and the back is too low, then they will jam and you will scratch the rounds going in on the front of the magazine body.

Hopefully this helps, its worth checking anyways.
 
Last edited:
mylesrom said:
Boonerbuck, I pulled this off another site

"Your problem may be that the mag body is not fitting into the recess on the floorplate/trigger guard assembly. There is a step cut out that the mag body must fit into so that the mag body is straight and aligned with the receiver cutout. This would cause the pinching and mis-alignment of the rear slit on the mag body. We have had similar experiences at SOTIC and it is almost always caused when the student fails to check the recess during re-assembly. This is a step we drill into the students for re-assembly check. Open the floorplate and feel inside the mag body. Does the mag body fit inside the floorplate assembly recess? If not, loosen the receiver screws and re-align the body with the recess. If this is difficult to accomplish, then remove the stock and check to see if the mag body fits inside the recess when the stock is off the weapon. It may have been torqued out of shape due to it not fitting before, and being squeezed under pressure of the receiver screws. Anytime that the weapon's mag body is not aligned with the recess and fitted into it, the results are exactly as you described your problems. In .308 it is the fourth round that is difficult to load and the fifth is impossible. The third round jams in an angled down position. Hope this helps. "



Boonerbuck, Pull your stock off and you will see see there is a cutout for the mag body that needs to line up with your barrel on the front . Place the mag body back into the barrel lining it up flush, the back of the mag body has a split, that has to be compressed when placing it back in the barrel assembly. Then reassemble the barrel and mag body as one unit into the stock and put the floorplate on . If the mag body is not flush with the barrel assembly, eg. the front it too high and the back is too low, then they will jam and you will scratch the rounds going in on the front of the magazine body.

Hopefully this helps, its worth checking anyways.

Thanks for the tip. I'll definately check into it before my next range trip.;)
 
martinbns said:
I had a 700 that if I loaded the fifth cartridge into the magazne wouldn't feed well, it caused the second shell to twist causing a jam. Try just putting three in the magazine and see if that solves your problem.

My 700 in .308 fits 5+1 no problem but one issue is still outstanding, the bolt just won't close completely with IVI 7.62mm brass.
 
mylesrom said:
Well they all can't be "perfect" like your Tikka.

Since your Remington and Winchesters are all crap, I will give you 50 bucks for the lot.. Also since you have the inside scoop, let me know when Remington is closing its doors, so I can get spare parts...
I did keep a Rem 700 in 260. Great calibre. The rifle though has needed work - magazine feed problems and stock bedding & floating. I am hearing a lot about Rem feed problems, especially with DBM models.
 
Airborn_69 said:
My 700 in .308 fits 5+1 no problem but one issue is still outstanding, the bolt just won't close completely with IVI 7.62mm brass.

that's because it's chambered for .308 Win, NOT 7.62 NATO. Slightly different dimensions.
 
Back
Top Bottom