Remington 1911 R1

Just embedding the pic.

5618D4F8306943618665D7BE23A64596.ashx


Rem1911-34552-prod.ashx


But ya, looks nice.
 
Has anyone heard what the release delay was with these? Production problems or was it an issue with the gun itself? Makes me a little leery until they are proven.
 
My only issue with it is that if you're putting out a gun that's supposed to bring back memories of years gone by (G.I. sights, spur hammer, traditional grip safety) you don't add a lowered and flared ejection port.

If I wanted a qualitygun that would be fun to shoot in the same price range it would be a Springfield Range Officer.
 
Love mine, 200 rounds down the pipe and no problem....it is my first .45 and just fell in love with the 1911 platform....
Heres a link to a good review with Huge close up pictures to see the details...
h ttp://forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=275331

:cheers:
 
I had a look at one that Epps had in stock. Felt pretty good in hand , nice and tight, actually the finish looked better than the STI Spartan I looked at also. For the price(650 IIRC) ,I think it was a good deal.
 
From what I was told the top half is a series 80... Not my cup of tea

If you had just the slide parts for a Series 80, the gun wouldn't fire because there would be nothing to depress the firing pin block plunger.

Notwithstanding Colt's reproduction, a Series 70 gun is one with a collet type barrel bushing, which I would actually consider less desirable than a conventional solid one. Some early Series 80 pistols had both the collet bushing and the firing pin block.

Personally, I don't think the Series 80 parts are that big of a deal. They have fewer issues than the Kimber or S&W firing pin blocks and the parts are are easier to remove than the former if you don't want them. The only real functional disadvantage is if you want to mount a Bo-Mar type adjustable sight, the plunger tunnel doesn't allow it to be mounted as low in the slide.
 
Back
Top Bottom