I never really gave the notion that CRF's are better suited for dangerous game animals as compared to push feed actions much thought.
Its just something I took for granted from campfire banter and gun writer statements.
I got to thinking about a conversation I had with a worker at a job site this last week.
He was adamant about the disadvantages of the Push Feed type action. Firmly stating that if the need arouse and a person had to chamber a round inverted with a push feed, the unfortunate soul would be shyt out of luck.
Being bored today, I took one of my Remington 700's (30-06), loaded 3 rounds into the mag. laid upside down and cycled the action. Three times I repeated this inverted trial.
The 700 fed and extracted 100% reliably inverted....myth busted?
Its just something I took for granted from campfire banter and gun writer statements.
I got to thinking about a conversation I had with a worker at a job site this last week.
He was adamant about the disadvantages of the Push Feed type action. Firmly stating that if the need arouse and a person had to chamber a round inverted with a push feed, the unfortunate soul would be shyt out of luck.
Being bored today, I took one of my Remington 700's (30-06), loaded 3 rounds into the mag. laid upside down and cycled the action. Three times I repeated this inverted trial.
The 700 fed and extracted 100% reliably inverted....myth busted?




















































