I didn’t have that issue, I think it was the first batches or so. The problem is cracking stocks.
I didn’t have that issue, I think it was the first batches or so. The problem is cracking stocks.
Yup, last training two guys brought their stocks to exchange for new onesAnd now the stocks are cracking.
Since you live up there, have you ever seen problems with laminate stocks before in the cold?Yup, last training two guys brought their stocks to exchange for new ones
Cannot say as I’ve only been here 5 years but haven’t heard about people having problems with their stocks.Since you live up there, have you ever seen problems with laminate stocks before in the cold?
Well I heard that during the trials it was a .308 version of the Steyr Scout vs the Tikka and most testers picked the Scout but rumours said that the Rangers wanted a wooden stock and also Steyr didn’t want Canada to acquire the blueprints so that Colt Canada could be manufacturing it locally.Lets not assume the tikka was chosen for any reason other than $$$
Its a hefty retail price for you and me but I bet tikka just won the bid.
Wouldnt be the first time government found a deal on something that turned out to be a boondoggle. Pretty sure they have winter in finnland.
I havent seen one in the flesh but until they started failing, it was the only tikka I would have considered owning.
Isnt it just a gunsite scout anyway??
hands down tikka they are way better qualityI'm in the market for a bolt-action gun chambered in .223 that will live it's life putting holes in paper at 100 yards or less and have narrowed it down to some variant of either the Remington 700 or the Tikka T3x. I'll be buying new.
Suggestions/experiences/recommendations one way or the other? Also, at its intended range use, would I find any value in going with a heavy barrel version of either of these?
Those rifles were not built by tikka if they were we would have a good rifle at reasonable priceLets not assume the tikka was chosen for any reason other than $$$
Its a hefty retail price for you and me but I bet tikka just won the bid.
Wouldnt be the first time government found a deal on something that turned out to be a boondoggle. Pretty sure they have winter in finnland.
I havent seen one in the flesh but until they started failing, it was the only tikka I would have considered owning.
Isnt it just a gunsite scout anyway??
Lol, I'll be that guy who answers what isn't in the question.... Kimber over both!![]()
Tikka. Its not even closeI'm in the market for a bolt-action gun chambered in .223 that will live it's life putting holes in paper at 100 yards or less and have narrowed it down to some variant of either the Remington 700 or the Tikka T3x. I'll be buying new.
Suggestions/experiences/recommendations one way or the other? Also, at its intended range use, would I find any value in going with a heavy barrel version of either of these?
No Roulette for me, I've got 5 (6.5 Creedmoor, 7-08, 308, 280AI, and 300WM) Kimber lightweight mountain rifles and everyone is very accurate. They all have B Stamped on the breech end of the barrel when you look in the action. The "B" from what I have been informed is a Bergara Primier barrel. I've heard some of the old Kimbers had some accuracy issues 10 or 15 years ago before their use of Bergara barrels.Google "Kimber roulette" folks and you'll get your answer to buy a Tikka.![]()
Glad they have that sorted out. Stories like that kept me from buying aa Kimber in the past. Most of my rifles are 700s, but if starting over I'd buy Tikkas and have fewer overall.No Roulette for me, I've got 5 (6.5 Creedmoor, 7-08, 308, 280AI, and 300WM) Kimber lightweight mountain rifles and everyone is very accurate. They all have B Stamped on the breech end of the barrel when you look in the action. The "B" from what I have been informed is a Bergara Primier barrel. I've heard some of the old Kimbers had some accuracy issues 10 or 15 years ago before their use of Bergara barrels.
Love my Kimbers and also very happy with my Tikkas, YMMV![]()




























