Removing old long gun registration sticker from receiver ?

Removing a serial number can be an offence.
The stickie may be the legal equivalent of a serial number.
If it is, those members advising removal could be counselling a criminal offence.
Might be an idea to find out exactly what the legal status is.

How would they ever know that there was a sticker on it in the first place?
 
I only had one firearm for which I was supplied a sticker - Walther GSP target pistol. Serial numbers on the old green slips were from the upper receivers (.22LR, .22S, .32S&WLong). New registration system I got a sticker for the lower receiver. Rather than attach that thing I used number punches and stamped the sticker number on the trigger guard.

The best place is inside the grip frame, than it does not fall off when you spray G96 all over the gun after every shoot. You do do that , right?
I think I may have a Stevens rifle with a numbered butt plate.
 
I had two 9422's all through that registration period. 9422's left the factory with serial numbers. Neither of mine had stickers, did not require them as they already have serial numbers to obtain registration. I can not imagine why someone stickered your 9422. Maybe your gun was previously owned by a blind person, or an inept idiot who could not find the serial number. Put the hot air gun to it. It is either that or take the advice of all the CGN lawyers, legal experts and fear mongers who have quoted chapter and verse here. May common sense prevail...!
 
Back when they were registering long guns you had an option of stamping a unique serial number on any firearm that did not have a number. I did several 22's with unique numbers. I still have one to pass on...

On December (12) 14th of 2002 (02) this was the first one done (01)

certificate.jpg

stamping.jpg
 
Back when they were registering long guns you had an option of stamping a unique serial number on any firearm that did not have a number. I did several 22's with unique numbers. I still have one to pass on...

On December (12) 14th of 2002 (02) this was the first one done (01)

certificate.jpg

stamping.jpg

Well done Dennis!
 
Removing a serial number can be an offence.
The stickie may be the legal equivalent of a serial number.
If it is, those members advising removal could be counselling a criminal offence.
Might be an idea to find out exactly what the legal status is.

There is a company serial number stamped in the metal and its all matching and visible. i wonder why they affixed a sticker on it and right in the center of the left side receiver instead of a more discreet place. If there was no serial number on the rifle I would understand the purpose of the sticker but there is a serial number and its clearly visible.
 
Back when they were registering long guns you had an option of stamping a unique serial number on any firearm that did not have a number. I did several 22's with unique numbers. I still have one to pass on...

On December (12) 14th of 2002 (02) this was the first one done (01)

certificate.jpg

stamping.jpg

Awesome...well done sir.
 
Back in the initial registration days , I know of an idiot, who planned to circumvent the system wrote , "no serial number " on the registration form when he sent it in.

He was issued stickers for each of his firearms.
This was not done to "circumvent the system". The way C-68 was written it was an offence to make a false statement on the registration form. Dave Tomlinson of the NFA made the point that "Make" didn't always describe who the manufacturer actually was. For example, "Sears" never made firearms but many guns were stamped "Sears" even though they were actually manufactured by companies like Hi-Standard and Stevens. Hence, if you entered "Sears" as the "Make" you were making a false statement and subjecting yourself to prosecution. Tomlinson's advice was to enter "Unknown" as the "Make" since that protected you from making a false statement. You were simply asserting that not being a firearm expert you could not state with certainty who the actual manufacturer was and did not want to risk prosecution by guessing. Lots of people did it and the CFC issued stickers for any gun so registered.
 
How could you determine the OP did not deliberately try and circumvent the system ? . He told me he deliberately wrote "no serial " even though most of his firearms did have serial numbers. His thoughts were they then couldn't track his firearms. Instead they issued him stickers with their serial numbers for each of his firearms.

Not that it matters now.
 
Back when they were registering long guns you had an option of stamping a unique serial number on any firearm that did not have a number. I did several 22's with unique numbers. I still have one to pass on...

On December (12) 14th of 2002 (02) this was the first one done (01)

certificate.jpg

stamping.jpg

Nice, I knew a long time smith that registered every piece of iron in the shop , old frames, a few grease gun and a bunch of custom built caulking guns, 28ga was nice.
He showed me the stack of paper, must have cost $1000's to run all that paper through the system, which was the whole point. I figured the Feds should have paid for my new computer , they did not think so, cheap bastards.
 
How could you determine the OP did not deliberately try and circumvent the system ? . He told me he deliberately wrote "no serial " even though most of his firearms did have serial numbers. His thoughts were they then couldn't track his firearms. Instead they issued him stickers with their serial numbers for each of his firearms.

Not that it matters now.
Serial numbers can be hard to read. An "I" might look like a "1" or a "O" like an "0". Some serial numbers on some firearms contained Cyrillic symbols that looked like english letters but were not. The way the law was written making a mistake when providing this information was a criminal offence. Protecting yourself from prosecution is not "circumventing the system".
 
They have not destroyed all documents for non restricted. I have received letters for non restricted guns that are now prohib. So how would they know if they destroyed them?
 
They have not destroyed all documents for non restricted. I have received letters for non restricted guns that are now prohib. So how would they know if they destroyed them?

simple,,EVERYBODY got the same list,,LOL..that original registry list was worthless the minute the LGR was abolished,,amy pwner could have sold their non restricteds the minute later with ZERO trace of that gun from that point on,i know people that actually work in the RCMP firearms program,and they laugh everytime someone mentions they kept a copy of the LGR,about it's only use now is at the toilet,
 
simple,,EVERYBODY got the same list,,LOL..that original registry list was worthless the minute the LGR was abolished,,amy pwner could have sold their non restricteds the minute later with ZERO trace of that gun from that point on,i know people that actually work in the RCMP firearms program,and they laugh everytime someone mentions they kept a copy of the LGR,about it's only use now is at the toilet,

Unless they use the old entry to get a warrant to boot your door after the firearm previously registered to you is not surrendered, nor been reported as destroyed or exported, when the amnesty period ends. After all, it would only seem reasonable that you likely would still be in possession of it.

Registration ALWAYS leads to confiscation.
 
Back
Top Bottom