I recently came across a couple of old early part of the 19th century .22 "boy's" rifles. A Stevens Crackshot and a Remington 6. Both are in rough shape with pitting of the outer barrels and in the case of the 6 the black (original?) paint is all but worn off other than under the foregrip. Wood in both cases is decent with the usual typical scratches and nicks that you'll find on a near hundred year old boy's gun that likely saw a lot of time left in a barn after being put away not properly cared for.
Now I COULD just clean up the obvious rust stains and leave the mottled black stains of the corrosion intact. But part of me would like to tart them up by doing some restoration. The question is at what point would a restoration be better than just leaving them with the patina of old age?
I know I should get pictures up to help you decide. I'm having dinner at the moment but should be able to post something up a little later tonight.
Now I COULD just clean up the obvious rust stains and leave the mottled black stains of the corrosion intact. But part of me would like to tart them up by doing some restoration. The question is at what point would a restoration be better than just leaving them with the patina of old age?
I know I should get pictures up to help you decide. I'm having dinner at the moment but should be able to post something up a little later tonight.


















































