Can anyone comment on the Revolution Arms Rev 4 versus the Canuck Operator? Both are inexpensive Benelli M4 clones. The Canuck Operator seems to get good reviews but I have not heard much about the Revolution Arms Rev 4. Comments??
Revolution Arms Rev 4 versus Canuck Operator
- Thread starter Redmaple
- Start date
The Impact REV 4 is yet another Turkish M4 clone white labeled by another Canadian company Revolution Armory. Was in the market for one so I did tons of research and the RA came out on top. So far so good, it feels great, it's smooth and affordable.
- Location
- East ontario
Yes we agree. It's the best of the m4 clones
This what we are using at the moment for the base of our Turknelli 2.0 builds
Attachments
How does the Turknelli 2.0 compare with a real M4? What are the differences? Pros and cons? I'm in the market to purchase one or the other but everytime I search on i just find one of two comments. Either "buy da real m4 cuz it's da real deal bro" or "buy the Turkish one because its a third of the price and spend the rest on ammo"
Granted this, I'm looking for a direct comparison. What do you gain and lose by going with either platform? Build quality, how well do they cycle all types of shells, known issues, how well do they shoot, how do they handle recoil, warranty if any, aftermarket support, parts support, and anything else i cant think of. How do the magazine tubes come pinned? Do they both come with 5.9 x 3"? Appreciate the help.
I handled a Rev4 in person and took it apart, and it was MUCH better made than the Sulan Arms Tac12 from last year ( i don't know if the Canucks Operator is the same or not).
What's better?
- front sight is straight and not crooked
- fit and finish a lot better. Looks like there's actually QA
- the bolt, bolt carrier and internal parts all have better fit and finish
- the cerekoted version had good finish
- the stock extension tube is an exact copy of the real M4, with the twist adjustment. The adjustable stock itself unfortunately is not an exact copy due to patents, i believe
Cosmetically the Rev4 is better.
What's better?
- front sight is straight and not crooked
- fit and finish a lot better. Looks like there's actually QA
- the bolt, bolt carrier and internal parts all have better fit and finish
- the cerekoted version had good finish
- the stock extension tube is an exact copy of the real M4, with the twist adjustment. The adjustable stock itself unfortunately is not an exact copy due to patents, i believe
Cosmetically the Rev4 is better.
