Just got mine a few days ago. Haven't taken it out shooting yet, so I can't talk about function/accuracy. The finish was rough/poor, but I knew about that going in. Plan to do a paint job on it anyway. I was looking for a project gun/beater, and I thought $180 was a fair price.
I almost completely dicked up the receiver screw holes when i tried to install a Weaver brand multi position base. I used the screws that came with the Weaver brand rail, but they weren't turning in smoothly. I'm glad I didn't start cranking them in right away. I took them out remembering that my RIA M22 came with its own base/screws. Upon comparing the Weaver brand screws to the factory ones that came with the rifle, there is considerably more TPI on the Weaver brand screws, although both appeared to be the same diameter. I guess I just don't have the patience, and my eagerness got the better of me. I chewed up, I'm guessing, the first 20-30% of the receiver threads before luckily spotting my mistake. I had to carefully re-reform the female receiver threads with some force using the original RIA screws, but I think I'm good now (close call). Hope some permanent thread locker at 15 in-lb will fix the chewed up thread engagement. Are they using metric? Who knows. They packed a crap load of "safety" pamphlets with the gun instead of giving me useful information such as "USE ORIGINAL OEM SCREWS WHEN MOUNTING AFTERMARKET BASE"! I know it's my mistake, but I even went as far as to live chat with an RIA rep to ask if the receiver was compatible with aftermarket 10/22 bases. Needless to say, he said "most likely" and did not tip me off to the difference in the screws. Still kind of pissed about that.
If I had to re-do it, I would just save my $ and buy a custom DLASK again. It's always nice to find a bargain, but considering the hassles and nearly destroying my receiver, its just no worth purchasing anything foreign unless it's from Europe. I say Europe because there is good product support, and there are rarely any surprises and mysteries. IMO, Ruger quality has gone down and prices have gone up. Have you guys seen the fit and finish of the BX-1 mags lately (not good to say the least). Also just bought an RFR, and was surprised to find that the magazine housing was poorly finished "very rough and poorly anodized". But it's OK because you will most likely only notice it after you buy it and take it home like me. However Ruger is not alone, it seems to be like that across the board with most North American manufacturers. I absolutely cannot justify spending $400 on a Ruger 10/22 these days. I wasn't all too entirely happy with my 10/22 I bought 4 years ago for $240. Poorly cut dovetails (angle of female dovetails did not line up with male dovetails), and finish on receiver felt really cheap and started to form matted patches after a few cleanings. Ended up selling it a year later.
Anyways, sorry to vent. If you have an RIA, watch out for the screws and use the OEM ones with after market bases. A good paint job, and it's still not a bad buy IMO. Curiously, I do prefer the feel of the RIA stock compared to Ruger's. Something to do with that square shape on the top of the stock makes for a more consistent cheek weld. The metal barrel band, metal trigger housing, and the metal butt plate really does give it that military feel. Not the worst stock for sure, very utilitarian.
Regards,
"J" man