Ross Two Star Mil

juno63

New member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Ohio, USA
New on this board,
looking for a rear sight bridge and sight for a Ross MKII**,milled or stamped will work. Any Ross collectors out there?
 
Try messaging to Tiriaq. He posts periodically on Rosses. Or, use the search tool and see what the archives report.

Good luck
 
Some II** rifles were factory fitted with a bridge and rear target sight. Others left the factory with only the sight on the barrel, and no provision for for an aperture sight. These were sometimes retrofitted. As is usual with Rosses, there are many variations. I am not sure if there was a standard for the spacing and location of the four holes required to install a bridge, if a screwed on bridge was fitted.
Is your rifle drilled and tapped? I have seen receivers with different hole spacings.
Finding a bridge and sight could be a challenge, although a rear sight from a Mk. III rifle was sometimes used, and these are certainly available, if a bridge can be found. The interface between rear sights of different patterns and the lugs of the bridge seem to be uniform. One of the numerous varieties of sights used on the Mk. II rifles could also be installed, and would be useful if it has an aperture, not just a notch.
I have a bridge/rear sight assembly in my parts hoard. It has the milled bridge, with a BSA Martin precision target sight. Same setup as on the II** I occasionally shoot. This is the only such unit I have been able to purchase over the years. Not saying they are in the category of hen's teeth or rocking horse poop, but they are not common.
maple leaf eh - You have returned?
 
Gord is another canadian who managed to escape under/through the razor-wire some years ago...He recently scooped a very clean MkII** Military up from one of the auction sites....
Here's the scoop (IMHO; anyway) on the receiver bridges.
1. Commercial MkII**'s- I currently have seventeen of these in my collection, and ALL were originally factory-fitted with bridges, but not necessarily sights.
Broadly based on serial ranges, the earliest ones were fitted with short, milled bases. Next came another slightly longer milled base. Towards the end of production, the barrel sight was eliminated completely, and the military milled base with lips for the stripper-clip machined in was fitted.These were normally fitted with a Commercial CanTool MkIII Battlesight with a very small aperature, and no inspectors mark on either the base or the sight itself. Many different 'approved' bridge sights were commercially available to shooters- I have three variations of BSA sights, one side-mounted Parker on a BSA base, a gem of a sight by Westley-Richards, three different CanTool commercial peeps, of course VSM-Peddie, others...
Military MkII**- the first three variations came with a receiver base stamped from sheet steel, with flimsy lips for the stripper-clips.The final version eliminated the barrel base/Sutherland sight and fitted one-piece top wood, and used the milled base fitted with an inspected, small-aperature CanTool MkIII battlesight.As well, all four screws securing the base to the receiver were center-popped (staked) at each end of the screw-slots.Some, but not all, bases were also whacked with an Inspector's stamp. I have four variations of the Military MkII**, but have owned and handled many more, both Military and Commercial. NEVER have I seen or heard of a MkII** that still has an undrilled receiver, so until someone actually comes up with one that wasn't built up on a 1905-E receiver, I stick with my supposition that all versions left the factory with a receiver base.
The serial range on Gord's falls in the middle of the change from the stamped-from-sheet base to the improved milled base. (hole centers are the same) so either will fit his rifle.
Any MkII** either Mil or Comm without drilled holes: please surface immediately!
 
Thanks for the intro Rossguy,
Tiriaq, sounds like the bridge you have would be correct, any chance you might part with it?
Also thanks for the expert info Rossguy, sounds like the bridge is correct does it not.
 
I would like to know who stripped the bridge in the first place.
This wouldn't be nearly as fun if the rifle was complete, good opportunity to learn something as well.
 
My apologies gentlemen,
Any future parts sniffing will be done in the equipment exchange section.
Hope that was a gimmie I just used.
Got work to do, must drop off for now, thanks for the input guys
 
I would like to know who stripped the bridge in the first place.
This wouldn't be nearly as fun if the rifle was complete, good opportunity to learn something as well.

Assuming very few people are going to have these parts and/or be able or willing to part with them, next thing I'd be asking for is one to borrow to give to a machinist/gunsmith so you can have one made up...I doubt you'll be able to find one without buying another parts rifle to nab it off...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom