RSM to 375 weatherby?

Its not some kind historic rifle; its a overly heavy Ruger with a real nice handle. Before they became a cult classic of a sort they were a discontinued rifle on the bargain rack for $999. I know, because I put them back on the rack after just about falling through the floor. Its your gun, do whatever you want with it, whether thats rechambering, shooting as is, looking at it or selling it.

Myself; I'd sell it and buy a Winchester, or really, just about anything else.

A little harsh... nobody who has handled the .375 RSM would argue the "overly heavy" assessment... they are pigs, and far too nose-heavy... that said, they are also an incredibly well made rifle... a solid, go anywhere, do anything sort... and usually with exceptional walnut on them. The beauty of good walnut is that it is not difficult to restore to it's former glory... or better. The .458's have better heft and balance, given the larger bore reduces significant weight. I have always thought that they should have made the .375 H&H in the Express contour... that would be just about the perfect all-around rifle.
 
Indeed, yet every time I went to buy a RSM, I turned back after looking at the huge gaps around the machined cut in the stock when the bolt handle was down. Why did Ruger do that?

A CNC machined cut can be made any size one wants, and should have been fitted much closer on those rifles.

Ted
 
Its not some kind historic rifle; its a overly heavy Ruger with a real nice handle. Before they became a cult classic of a sort they were a discontinued rifle on the bargain rack for $999. I know, because I put them back on the rack after just about falling through the floor. Its your gun, do whatever you want with it, whether thats rechambering, shooting as is, looking at it or selling it.

Myself; I'd sell it and buy a Winchester, or really, just about anything else.

Coming from a guy who had a 10(?) shot detach mag attached to his big bore?
The model 70 synthetic stainless classic is by far the worst balanced 375 I have handled.
 
I just weighed it 9lbs 14 oz bare. Is that too much gun for you? Maybe. Others not so much.

What cal and is it the later version with barrel band or the early version like the OP?

I always guessed the early .375s at 11-12ish pounds. Never weighed one though. That is a lot of weight for a .375!

I like the later RSMs, not too big a fan of the earlier ones.
 
What cal and is it the later version with barrel band or the early version like the OP?

I always guessed the early .375s at 11-12ish pounds. Never weighed one though. That is a lot of weight for a .375!

I like the later RSMs, not too big a fan of the earlier ones.

The walnut has a larger effect on the weight than the version... I have owned six of the RSM .375's and they all weighed between 9 lb/14 oz and 10 lb/6 oz... four were barrel band rifles and two were "through stock" rifles... but I feel the density of the walnut was the biggest contributor to the weight variance.
 
What cal and is it the later version with barrel band or the early version like the OP?

I always guessed the early .375s at 11-12ish pounds. Never weighed one though. That is a lot of weight for a .375!

I like the later RSMs, not too big a fan of the earlier ones.

The later version 375 H&H with the barrel band weighed 9lbs 14 oz.
 
Back
Top Bottom