Yeah you can compare. The stock is the same Disney cartoon contours, it takes down the same way, and uses the same magazine latch design.
(1) Did they finally put some room in the stock for a spare mag and a box of ammo? If not, then it has not been improved there.
The rear sight was crap, the front not much better, but OK for grouse, rabbits, and squirrels at a few feet range. (2) Scope mounts stop the rifle from being stored in the stock.
The original concept was reasonable, the end design was pretty craptastic, but was better than not having a firearm at all. As designs go, it was and is, a survival kit gun that was meant to be stored more than used.
That leaves aside all the functional issues that came out of the various manufacturing problems from doing the design as cheap and lightweight as they could make it.
So, yeah. I can compare the design in general, as well as the experiences I had with my Charter Arms version.
Cheers
Trev