Ruger Announces Six New PC Carbine Models

[philhut]

I wanted a stainless takedown option like the 10/22

The large foreend would look great on a wooden stock option.

 

[buckbrush]

I don't think a 10mm blow back action is feasible.

 

[Can-down]

I don't think a 10mm blow back action is feasible.

There are several on the market already.

 

[r34skyline]

I too like the free floated version.

There are several on the market already.

Doesn't mean it's the ideal option in the sub market.

 

[Can-down]

Doesn't mean it's the ideal option in the sub market.

Maybe your right and Buckbrush was talking about economic feasibility..... I understood it as mechanical feasibility.

 

[Superfly999]

Each one of those hurts my eyes

 

[Can-down]

Ouch!
They don't hurt the wallet that's for sure.
The reliability and accuracy is also not painful and easy to get used to....

 

[Greazyjungle]

Fingers crossed for a 5.7mm model...hate being neglected by the manufacturers because I'm an obscure caliber fanboy (but I love complaining about it...)

(Insert sarcasm emoji here...)

 

[r34skyline]

Maybe your right and Buckbrush was talking about economic feasibility..... I understood it as mechanical feasibility.

I was speaking from an end user perspective. If you've ever tried to control a ump45 in full auto you will know exactly why.

For semi auto civvie usage i would wager it's not a popular enough cartridge to justify it.

 

[dimeN]

Oh man
I can dig it ! Cool lookin

Just take my money... dammit

 

[Daver_II]

That barrel is way too off center for my ocd

 

[cyclone]

I'm in for a 10mm

Agreed!...

 

[stuckon308]

I just want a freaking Beretta mag well!!!!

 

[zombee]

I would totally go for a stainless. Maybe cerakote it to make it non-reflective.

(I seem to recall rumors that magpul might make a backpacker-like stock?)

Would like SIG P250/320 magwell.

 

[lone-wolf]

Fingers crossed for a 5.7mm model...hate being neglected by the manufacturers because I'm an obscure caliber fanboy (but I love complaining about it...)

(Insert sarcasm emoji here...)

That would be amazing tbh

 

[buckbrush]

Maybe your right and Buckbrush was talking about economic feasibility..... I understood it as mechanical feasibility.

I meant mechanically.

 

[Chargerguy]

#2 or #3 would be my choice. These look great.

 

[old303]

The handguard looks like it's dangling off the barrel; somehow my sense of rightness is saying they should be centred.

But the other thing that occurs to me is that the back half looks the same, so they could maybe sell just the guard/barrel bit for people to swap onto their existing carbine.

 

[adamg]

Fingers crossed for a 5.7mm model...hate being neglected by the manufacturers because I'm an obscure caliber fanboy (but I love complaining about it...)

(Insert sarcasm emoji here...)

Wouldn't it still be inferior to a P90 in every way?

 

[r34skyline]

Wouldn't it still be inferior to a P90 in every way?

Cheaper simpler magazine system(assuming it uses the five seven magazine). Conventional manual of arms. Takedown feature combined with nr makes it ultra compact more so than an nr p90. Oh and its like 1/3 the price. Keep in mind im speaking from the perspective of a civvie joe shooter. Oh one definite technical advantage would be height over bore. P90 is horrible for that.

Yes for a mil/le/contractors the p90 is a proven sub/pdw and this wouldnt be as appealing.