The Mod 70 is machined from bar steel, the Ruger is investment cast, so is the Mod 70 stronger? In my opinion yes. I prefer the steel bottom metal on my Mod 70s to the pot metal of the Rugers and I prefer the classic stock c/w cheekpiece and better grade of walnut used in the Mod 70s. Virtually all the Mod 70s I have owned also outshoot Rugers by a significant margin. Most Rugers from the box are hard pressed to shoot into 1 1/2" @100 mtrs even with significant load development, with out bedding and tweeking and playing with forend pressure. Mod 70s have all been better groupers right from the box and respond to tweeking more readily to become easy sub MOA rifles (except for an old push feed Ftrwt I had in 257 Bob). Fully 1/2 of the Rugers I have owned and shot would not shoot sub MOA even after tweeking and bedding, while only one Mod 70 was so aberrant. Now I'm talking more than 1/2 doz of each in my experience, infact I own 3 Ruger CF rifles right now and have been playing with loads for them on and off and I also own 3 Mod 70s as I type this which I am also playing with loads for..........JMHE and YMMV
AND I still think the Remington is a better action and rifle!!!!!!!!!!!! But the new Mod 70 Super Grades are a photofinish close second.
Thanks for the input. The quality of the walnut does not mean much to me because I want a stainless synthetic but the rest is interesting info. Almost all my rifles are blued with walnut, I would like just one well rounded all weather rifle to take some abuse in crap weather.



If it's stainless synthetic you're looking for, then you'll want the Model 70 Extreme Weather Stainless Steel. That's about as rugged as you're going to get.
[/B]
Kinda like this old girl who's been over most of the world and just keeps on killing sh!t, new paint job every 10 years or so and a new recoil pad and she's like new again...........this is my old Rem 700, 300 Wby grafted into a Sako fiberglass stock from Brown Prec and Sako bottom metal.
And this is how she will shoot when I do my part..........
![]()




























