I've seen both and am in the market for an SR22. If I want a restricted tacticool rimfire I'll buy an AR and a .22 Conversion so it can run double duty.. The fact that I can build an SR22 into whatever I want non-res with no mag capacity limits, and no reliability issues seals the deal.
Ruger SR-22 vs Smith & Wesson M&P15-22
- Thread starter DocBurN
- Start date
Restricted or non- I only have one place to shoot- at the range, so classification isn't a deal breaker.
As well- the standard AR geometry and function is the same as the M&P. IE: Functiona charging handle. Does the SR22?
As well- the standard AR geometry and function is the same as the M&P. IE: Functiona charging handle. Does the SR22?
Why, is it supposed to? How is this a slight against the SR-22?
TheGamerXxX
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- North of the 49, Manitoba
SR22 only because it's Non-Restricted.
Otherwise it'd be the M&P
Luke
Otherwise it'd be the M&P
Luke
It isn't a slight...but if you are buying a rimfire to practice for centerfire AR-15's, then using the same function/ergonomics would be a benefit that the SR22 would lack. That's not a slight against it, just that it'd be an apples/oranges issue.
