Thought it was time for the next update. If you are a 1911 guru don't bother this is intended for us lesser mortals.
I have now put 1000 rounds through my SR1911. My comments below are in relation to a Sig 226 as a point of reference. Generally considered to be accurate and super reliable.
The 1911 is easier to shoot well than the 226. It takes less time to get used to the 1911 trigger. I could shoot the 1911 well from the beginning. The 226 took a few hundred rounds. After many rounds freehand accuracy is about the same 7 to 8" groups at 15 yards with the majority within 5". The spread is my shooting ability both guns are much better based on some braced testing I did.
Reliability. After about 200 rounds you can feel the 1911 staring to gum up and it can lead to a very occasional FTF. I have had 2 in the last 500 rounds. If the gun is clean it works flawlessly. My 1911 is pretty tight in the slide and I am sure this is part of the issue. The 1911 does not like being dry the sig doesn't really care. The sig will tolerate much more neglect. In about 3000 rounds I have not had any failures of any sort with the sig.
Cleaning. The 1911 takes longer to strip and clean than the sig. Not difficult but there are more parts and it is a little more fussy to strip clean and reassemble. You do not need tools to strip the 1911 but releasing the bushing by hand can bite your fingertip. A detail clean of the sig takes about 5 minutes whereas the 1911 takes 10-15. Personally I don't mind as I quite like cleaning the 1911. I just like the mechanism.
Accuracy. Good in a real world sense but if you are a precision shooter I don't think it is for you. Based on my bench testing about 2" at 15 yards.
Overall I really like the 1911. The feel, handling, look of the gun are very good. I really like it. But always a but, it is an old design and you need to pay it more attention than a glock or sig. If I wanted a shtf gun it would be the sig but for fun at the range the SR1911 is a really nice gun.
I have now put 1000 rounds through my SR1911. My comments below are in relation to a Sig 226 as a point of reference. Generally considered to be accurate and super reliable.
The 1911 is easier to shoot well than the 226. It takes less time to get used to the 1911 trigger. I could shoot the 1911 well from the beginning. The 226 took a few hundred rounds. After many rounds freehand accuracy is about the same 7 to 8" groups at 15 yards with the majority within 5". The spread is my shooting ability both guns are much better based on some braced testing I did.
Reliability. After about 200 rounds you can feel the 1911 staring to gum up and it can lead to a very occasional FTF. I have had 2 in the last 500 rounds. If the gun is clean it works flawlessly. My 1911 is pretty tight in the slide and I am sure this is part of the issue. The 1911 does not like being dry the sig doesn't really care. The sig will tolerate much more neglect. In about 3000 rounds I have not had any failures of any sort with the sig.
Cleaning. The 1911 takes longer to strip and clean than the sig. Not difficult but there are more parts and it is a little more fussy to strip clean and reassemble. You do not need tools to strip the 1911 but releasing the bushing by hand can bite your fingertip. A detail clean of the sig takes about 5 minutes whereas the 1911 takes 10-15. Personally I don't mind as I quite like cleaning the 1911. I just like the mechanism.
Accuracy. Good in a real world sense but if you are a precision shooter I don't think it is for you. Based on my bench testing about 2" at 15 yards.
Overall I really like the 1911. The feel, handling, look of the gun are very good. I really like it. But always a but, it is an old design and you need to pay it more attention than a glock or sig. If I wanted a shtf gun it would be the sig but for fun at the range the SR1911 is a really nice gun.
Last edited:


















































