I hate to say it, but the "out with the old and in with the new" is the way of the world. Canada is certainly guilty of the same thing, and yes, it absolutely pisses me off.
Having that said, I'm pretty sure most/many of these old rifles are Mosins or models of rifles that we can't have anyway. When you think about the $100 Mosin, much of the cost is shipping, handling, and middlemen before a profit margin is applied: what do they actually pay for the rifles out of the Ukraine? ten bucks each? So if you were the Russian in charge and had to choose between a massive amount of labor to save old outdated and unused rifles that are expensive to store, OR melt them down, keep your factories employed by recycling millions of pounds or quality gun metal to make modern and useful military arms, what would you choose?
I hate the idea of melting them down, but export restrictions and economics are dictating the actions here.
Having that said, I'm pretty sure most/many of these old rifles are Mosins or models of rifles that we can't have anyway. When you think about the $100 Mosin, much of the cost is shipping, handling, and middlemen before a profit margin is applied: what do they actually pay for the rifles out of the Ukraine? ten bucks each? So if you were the Russian in charge and had to choose between a massive amount of labor to save old outdated and unused rifles that are expensive to store, OR melt them down, keep your factories employed by recycling millions of pounds or quality gun metal to make modern and useful military arms, what would you choose?
I hate the idea of melting them down, but export restrictions and economics are dictating the actions here.





















































